« | Home | »

‘Thank you, dictator’

Tags: | | |

Hosni Mubarak was the Israeli government’s favourite dictator, so it was hard for them, and for the mass media, to say goodbye to him. Coverage of the uprisings elsewhere in North Africa and the Middle East has been fairly supportive of the protesters, but Egypt was a special case. As Gabi Ashkenazi, the recently retired head of the army, put it, ‘stability is preferable to democracy.’ The refrain throughout has been: ‘Israel is anxiously following events.’ But on 26 January, the Israeli establishment was hopeful that its neighbours would fail in their struggle for democracy. The daily Ma’ariv, under the headline ‘Trusting Mubarak’, said: ‘Israeli officials are optimistic: Egypt will overcome’ – ‘Egypt’ here and elsewhere meaning the despotic administration, not the people.

In the days that followed, and perhaps as a way of avoiding the charge of being ‘democratophobes’, Israeli analysts took the Islamophobic option. Israel HaYom, a free popular daily owned by the US billionaire Sheldon Adelson, argued that the events in Egypt may be ‘good news for democracy, but in the background is the growing power of the Islamists and the long arm of Iran’. Yedi’ot Ahronot ran an article comparing the Egyptian struggle to the Iranian revolution under the headline: ‘Good intentions – all the way to hell’.

Meanwhile on TV, Channel 2 aired a discussion about the Muslim Brotherhood. It started with a short film about the movement, including a few interviews with its leaders. None of them showed signs of fundamentalism or expressed a desire for a religious revolution. ‘They have said some very moderate things,’ the presenter conceded. ‘They are willing to accept the peace treaty with Israel… and they are willing to recognise Israel.’ But the channel’s correspondent on Arab affairs was there to set things straight. ‘They might have some internal disputes about how they should present their views of Israel,’ he said, ‘but there is no room for mistakes… For example, one of their leaders said today that the peace treaty with Israel should be called off.’ What a relief. The Muslim Brothers were evil again.

According to Ha’aretz, during the first week of the protests Israel called for the US and Europe to curb their criticisms of the Egyptian dictator. When Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, was in Jerusalem, President Shimon Peres said to her: ‘The world saw what happened in Gaza when they pushed for democratic elections and a dangerous movement rose to power.’ A few days later, the minister for regional development, Silvan Shalom, said that ‘the West should not push for democracy’ in Egypt ‘as it might weaken the moderate powers there, and will allow Tehran to renew the Iranian Empire.’ So that’s what regional ‘development’ means.

When Mubarak finally stepped down, Yedi’ot Ahronot suggested that an ‘honourable way’ should be found for his departure. In Israel HaYom the foreign editor praised Mubarak for maintaining the peace treaty with Israel, ‘which continued even during Operation Cast Lead’, the Israeli offensive in Gaza two years ago during which 1400 Palestinians were killed. In its concluding sentence, the op-ed said: ‘Thank you, dictator.’

Comments on “‘Thank you, dictator’”

  1. Geoff Roberts says:

    What is going to happen to all of these dictators? Rejected by the people, spurned by the western nations who have courted them so assidously for the past forty odd years, viewed as failures by the monarchs of the Gulf and down to their last Billion Dollars or two? I have a modest proposal – would Israel like to take them and their entourages in as guests? If they give up 20% of their ill-gotten gains it would help Israel to balance its budget and help the USA out of a mess. Be good for the Palestinians too. Over to you, Mr. Netanyahu.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement