« | Home | »

Agit-Pop

Tags: |

Resistance was futile. The X Factor winner Matt Cardle’s sickly debut single, ‘When We Collide’, made Christmas No. 1. The two favourite outside chances – Billy Bragg et al’s version of John Cage’s 4’33”, and Captain SKA’s ‘Liar Liar’ – didn’t even make the Top 40. If it seems obvious now that the nation would choose the most popular participant in the nation’s most popular game show over four and a half minutes of near-silence, or a slice of ebullient agit-pop, it didn’t seem that way a few weeks ago. Both tracks had well-run campaigns behind them, Facebook groups with masses of members, whips on Twitter; ‘Liar Liar’ disgusted George Osborne on Newsnight while the Guardian thought 4’33” likely to be the ‘most serious competition the forthcoming X Factor winner will have to face’. Sadly it wasn’t.

Still, there was resistance. Both ‘Liar Liar’ and 4’33” are essentially protest songs, though in very different styles. The former is in the classic mould: the singer is pissed off at the government, telling them they should ‘cut the rich, not the poor’. She accuses Clegg, Osborne and Cameron of going back on their pre-election promise to cut fairly, denouncing them in the chorus as liars over an electro-reggae skank and jazz-hand horns. 4’33” is more passive: it can be read as a gesture of resignation, accepting whatever sounds happen to be made while it’s being performed. Yet the piece – certainly at one point during its long gestation period – was intended as a political statement. In a lecture at Columbia University in the 1940s Cage declared his disgust for the muzak piped into factories in order to ‘motivate’ workers, and talked about releasing a silent record that could be slipped into the factory playlist to give workers an occasional break.

4’33” by these lights is a more general protest than ‘Liar Liar’. It takes issue with the wider problem of the manipulation of the people by the ruling class, which makes it more fitting, conceptually, as an anthem for people who see the recent demonstrations as being about more than the cuts; who see them as an end to the ‘consensus of indifference’, as a reawakening of popular leftism. Though 4’33” could never be an anthem proper, because you can’t sing along to it. And it’s no surprise that a song without a tune, or beat, or bassline, failed to capture the imagination of the public at large and stalled way short of the Christmas hit parade.

The campaigns surrounding ‘Liar Liar’ and 4’33”, along with the calls from students, journalists and others for new protest songs, testify to a widespread desire to repoliticise pop music. Patronising trash like ‘When We Collide’ is the muzak of our time, drawn up by cynical suits anxious to keep the public doting and serene – it would be fantastic if a politically charged, dissenting voice could overrule it. But to do so it needs more hooks than 4’33” and more punch, and depth, than ‘Liar Liar’ – something more along the lines of Public Enemy c. Nation of Millions?

Comments on “Agit-Pop”

  1. Geoff Roberts says:

    Is there a score for 4’33”?

    • klhoughton says:

      Absolutely. There are three movements.

      One must close the lid and open it at precise moments, so that the audience’s voluntary reactions are both managed well enough to not distract and not so well managed that the piece loses its vitality.

  2. kazbel says:

    4′ 33″ did make the top 40. It reached number 21. Unfortunately I missed the broadcast when the BBC (I presume) played it but I would like to think it is now included regularly on playlists of pop channels throughout the country. I think many shop workers would appreciate its inclusion on the tracks of festive muzak they are compelled to endure all day in December.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement