« | Home | »

Who bought the Aviodome?


I’ve been more or less living out of a suitcase for several months now, so when I saw that one of Europe’s first geodesic domes was for sale I rushed to bid for it with the last of my savings. The Aviodome, as the former National Aviation Museum at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport was known, was designed by R. Buckminster Fuller and completed in 1971. With 2700 m2 of floor space, a radius of 34.14m and height of 23m, the aluminium dome at Schiphol was the largest of its time.

In 2003 the museum moved to a new building at Lelystad Airport, leaving the original Aviodome behind. The Living Gospel Church bought it the following year and the dome was dismantled and packed away into 29 containers in preparation for its move to Haarlemmermeer in North Holland. Dome watchers concerned that there was no sign of a reassembled dome (the website Waar is het Aviodome? – ‘Where is the Aviodome?’ – was set up in 2008) have had to wait until now for more news.

Unable to get permission to construct the dome, its owner is fed up of paying 700 euros a month for storage and at the beginning of November put the dome up for sale, asking for bids and a statement from interested buyers. I explained that I have always wanted to own a dome of my own; a structure of exceptional strength with a high ratio of enclosed area to surface; an ideal icosahedral home (office, too, possibly) that I was willing to share with others in exchange for a hand with assembling it, which looks quite daunting to judge by this video from 1971.

When I checked back the next day a sold sign had already gone up on the site. (I don’t know how my offer compared; I suspect it was on the low side.) If the new owner – I’m still trying to find out who it is and would be grateful for any leads – has made an impulse buy they now regret, Fuller’s 1969 book An Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth should provide the necessary encouragement. As the self-styled ‘comprehensive anticipatory design scientist’ says, ‘we begin by eschewing the role of specialists who deal only in parts. Becoming deliberately expansive instead of contractive, we ask: “How do we think in terms of wholes?” If it is true that the bigger the thinking becomes the more lastingly effective it is, we must ask: “How big can we think?”’

Comments on “Who bought the Aviodome?”

  1. Geoff Roberts says:

    It just flew over my house in a north-easterly direction. Didn’t pick up any signals so it must have been the an Irish banker making an escape.

  2. outofdate says:

    If it’s any consolation, they’re rubbish, yet there seems to be a whole subculture of enthusiasts who regard them as the quintessential Beautiful Idea — bold, simple, universally adaptable and magnificently practical, except not. Just the sort of thing secretive cranky billionaires go in for, so it’s probably now warping and wasting power in Astana or Nebraska.

    Fuller seems to have been the Mr Magoo of anticipatory whatsits, to the point where I think not one of his adorable space-age predictions came true (‘By 1990,’ he’d declare, ‘humans will be individually airborne.’), but that’s better than undead Marshall McLuhan, who never got a prediction wrong and will still be chilling people to the marrow when everything we cherish has turned to dust.

    • A.J.P. Crown says:

      Bucky Fuller’s kind of snuck back into fashion again. For the man who has everything, Norman Foster’s rebuilt himself a dymaxion car and then Arkitekt Grimshaw has dumped a huge bunch of domes in Cornwall and called it the Eden Project.

      Thank god they never covered midtown Manhattan with a dome. It would probably be ready for demolition now and everyone would be wondering how to get rid of it. I love this old picture of it: no structure is shown, just a big transparent, clean and shiny bubble.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement