« | Home | »

No Strategic Sense

Tags: |

On 9 June a letter appeared on the internet purportedly written by Prince Turki bin Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia. It warned of a coup within the Saudi armed forces and said that if the royal family does not step down soon they risk ending up like Nicolae Ceauşescu or the Shah of Iran. The note had no letterhead, was unsigned and there was no accompanying press release. But it quickly spread across the internet, and is the subject of much discussion on Facebook and other sites.

Prince Turki was the deputy minister for defence and aviation during the reign of King Faisal until he was sacked in a scandal involving his Moroccan wife. Since the mid-1980s he has been living in exile in Cairo on the top two floors of the Semiramis Hotel, guarded by two Austrian security companies. He is widely viewed as powerless because even when his reformist son Prince Sultan bin Turki was kidnapped in Geneva by the Saudi government in June 2003 he raised no public objection with his brothers.

One theory is that Prince Turki wrote the letter so he could ask his brothers to pay him to deny it. He has neither confirmed nor denied that the letter came from him, though the Saudi Press Agency has issued a statement saying he denied it.

On 12 June a report appeared in the Times saying that Saudi Arabia would drop its air defences to allow Israeli jets to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities. Such close collaboration with Israel would not only be a policy u-turn for Saudi Arabia, but a deeply unpopular and therefore risky one. In a recent interview with Asharq al-Awsat, the Saudi ambassador in London, Prince Mohammed bin Nawaf, refuted the story. The Israeli government has neither confirmed nor denied it.

Then towards the end of July came rumours that Saudi Arabia’s Tabuk airport had been closed to civilian flights so the Israeli Air Force could start preparing it as a forward operating base for assault helicopters. ‘This can’t be true because it makes no strategic sense,’ a Saudi magazine editor told me. ‘If they said they were using UAE or Oman to make a forward operating base then maybe we would believe this, but when there is only a couple of hundred kilometres from Eilat to Tabuk the Israelis don’t need to use it.’

And last week there was a rumour, reported by Ha’aretz, that the Head of Mossad was visiting the Kingdom to discuss Iran and its nuclear programme. Again, this made little sense since all the senior intelligence chiefs you would expect him to meet with were out of the country at the time.

So what’s going on? According to the Saudi magazine editor, ‘there is a propaganda war between the media and intelligence communities in Saudi Arabia and Iran. The Iranians are trying to make problems for Saad Hariri in Lebanon and harm the Saudi reputation in the Islamic world by saying they are co-operating with the Israelis. Besides mobilising every available media resource Iran is instructing its supporters in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Bahrain and Kuwait to target the Kingdom and its rulers.’

Comments on “No Strategic Sense”

  1. Bad Bart says:

    I understand this is in reference to a comment made by a Saudi, but what does he mean by about the Iranians causing problems for Saad Hariri? How so?

    • Hugh Miles says:

      Currently the United Nations Special Tribunal on Lebanon is investigating the 2005 assassination of Saad Hariri’s father Rafik Hariri, who had close ties to Saudi Arabia. The Tribunal’s findings are expected later this year. Hezbollah’s Hassan Nasrallah, who has links to Iran, has denied culpability but if as many anticipate the Tribunal names specific Hezbollah members to be indicted in the killing, Lebanon’s fragile national unity government could collapse and Hezbollah would be placed under international pressure to disarm. It will resist, which will likely lead to further foreign intervention, deepening instability and possibly a Lebanese explosion. Last Friday King Abdullah visited Lebanon as part of his four-nation “Arab unity tour” to try and alleviate fears of a new sectarian war breaking out.

  2. Bad Bart says:

    Thanks! That makes a lot more sense to me now.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement