« | Home | »


Tags: | |

Last summer, General Stanley McChrystal described US operations in Afghanistan as a ‘retail war’. Now, thanks to Michael Hastings’s notorious profile of the general in Rolling Stone, it’s clearer what McChrystal meant: the conflict isn’t only about winning over Afghans to the US cause, but also about selling a war that can’t be won to increasingly sceptical Americans.

The US commanders in Afghanistan know there can be no victory. Hastings quotes a colleague of McChrystal’s, Major-General Bill Mayville: ‘It’s not going to look like a win, smell like a win or taste like a win. This is going to end in an argument.’ Mayville, as Hastings explains, is one of McChrystal inner circle,

a handpicked collection of killers, spies, geniuses, patriots, political operators and outright maniacs. There’s a former head of British Special Forces, two Navy Seals, an Afghan Special Forces commando, a lawyer, two fighter pilots and at least two dozen combat veterans and counterinsurgency experts.

One of the lesser points to be drawn from Hastings’s piece is that the word ally is a term of derision for McChrystal’s team and refers to French and German troops, but not to British forces.

Hasting’s piece has become instantly famous for what McChrystal says about US civilian officials, such as Richard Holbrooke and Joe Biden, and McChrystal today goes to the White House to explain himself to Obama. Maybe he’ll be fired, maybe he won’t. Hastings implies, intriguingly, that if Obama does sack McChrystal, then the president will not just be getting rid of an outspoken and revered commander: Obama may risk bringing down the entire US strategy in Afghanistan that he agreed to last year. Whatever happens, today’s meeting at the White House may well be the beginning of Mayville’s ‘argument’.

When he was a cadet at West Point, McChrystal wrote a short story about an assassination attempt on an American president. Hastings writes:

As managing editor of The Pointer, the West Point literary magazine, McChrystal wrote seven short stories that eerily foreshadow many of the issues he would confront in his career. In one tale, a fictional officer complains about the difficulty of training foreign troops to fight; in another, a 19-year-old soldier kills a boy he mistakes for a terrorist. In ‘Brinkman’s Note’, a piece of suspense fiction, the unnamed narrator appears to be trying to stop a plot to assassinate the president. It turns out, however, that the narrator himself is the assassin, and he’s able to infiltrate the White House: ‘The president strode in smiling. From the right coat pocket of the raincoat I carried, I slowly drew forth my 32-caliber pistol. In Brinkman’s failure, I had succeeded.’

McChrystal presumably won’t be taking a 32-calibre pistol with him to the White House today. But if he is fired, his failure could be construed as a kind of limited personal success – to have extricated himself from the war in Afghanistan, even if the rest of the US army is still embroiled in it.

Comments on “Brinkmanship”

  1. Bad Bart says:

    This is great! McChrystal is finally in trouble for being reckless. Not because of his callous and wanton disregard for Iraqi and Afghani lives, which he obviously was willing to sacrifice for political expedience. Rather, the most horrible things he’s done are obviously his saying naughty (and in some ways quite astute) things about Obama, Biden and Holbrooke.

  2. Locus says:

    By sheer coincidence, a piece in today’s New York Times on how the ordinary decent soldiers on the ground have lost faith in McChrystal’s leadership, and never much liked him anyway. With the top brass insubordinate, it must be a relief for Washington that the NYT, at least, still knows how to take an order.

    “General Faces Unease Among His Own Troops, Too”

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Stephen W. Smith:
    The French Intervention in Mali
    7 February 2013

    ‘Depending on what counts as military intervention, France changed the course of history by force in sub-Saharan Africa about thirty times between 1945 and 1990.’

    Bruce Whitehouse:
    What went wrong in Mali?
    30 August 2012

    ‘The Republic of Mali has long been seen as the exception to the dictatorships or civil wars that have seemed the rule in West Africa since the end of the Cold War.’

    Jeremy Harding: Algeria’s Camus
    4 December 2014

    ‘Camus liked to hector the settlers, whose behaviour reflected the structural injustices of colonialism. All the same, he felt that certain misconceptions in metropolitan France needed straightening out.’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement