« | Home | »

At the IHH Offices

Tags: | |

On Thursday, the Fatih Mosque in Istanbul held a funeral for the dead from the Mavi Marmara, one of the ships of the Gaza flotilla. Many of the mourners were activists from IHH, the Islamic charity that organised the flotilla. Children swung Palestinian and, in some cases, Hizbullah flags; women in black chador wore green ‘We are all Palestinian’ headbands; others were in Turkish headscarfs and matching outfits; still others, jeans and T-shirts. From the packed mosque courtyard came shouts of ‘Katil Israil’ and ‘Kahrolsun Israil’ (‘Murderer Israel’, ‘Damn Israel’). It wasn’t the first time I’d heard those words in Turkey, but it was a striking moment. Turkey and Israel have always, at least officially, been allies in a region where Israel has few friends. The flotilla incident has probably changed their relationship for ever.

The IHH offices are a block away from the mosque complex, across the street from some garages and a bookshop. Two men behind a desk were keeping an eye on lists of activists from the flotilla: ‘The Wounded in Israel’, ‘The Wounded in Ankara’, ‘The Martyrs’. A Belgian woman called Asmaa stood to one side. Her sister and a friend had been on the boat. ‘They were not injured, but I can tell, they are psychologically damaged.’ I asked her what she thought of the suggestion that IHH had ties to extremism. ‘If these people are terrorists,’ she said, looking around, ‘then humanity is lost.’

In the bookshop across the street, Mohammet, an older man in a blue blazer, praised the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, for standing with the civil organisations during the crisis. ‘We are pleased by the sensitivity of the European and Turkish reactions,’ he said. ‘They are almost the same now; tied by what is in their hearts.’

‘Obama is a big change for America,’ he went on. ‘He cannot continue with the same policies. He cannot support Israel for ever when they are doing this. That’s not only for the US but for anyone who has a heart. The change has to be in the Arab countries, the dictatorships as well. It’s not only the US’s problem, but the world’s problem.’

I asked whether there had ever been anyone in Turkey who supported Israel. ‘There are no people on Israel’s side. Don’t even ask that question.’

The president of the IHH came into the bookshop and sat down in the back. The men, most of them Turkish but also an activist from Pakistan, got up and joined him. They talked strategy: people should not work only in small groups, the flotilla had been effective because many people from many countries had worked together, collaboration was crucial. More men came in to listen.

‘Real Jewish people won’t let their government commit these acts,’ a 24-year-old man called Fatih said. ‘We are so tired of being called terrorists. It’s like you hear Islam and terrorist together on TV and you are so disturbed. Those two words don’t go together! You know, if you keep saying someone is something enough, the people will become it. But we will not.’

Fatih had just returned from New York, where he’d been studying economics and political science at Hunter College. Turks under the age of 30 make up, by some estimates, almost half the population, and many are hungry for education and work abroad, a notion that terrifies Europeans who don’t want Turkey to join the European Union. I’ve often heard young people say that of course they would leave Turkey if they could. And yet I no longer think the Turkish government ever believed they’d join the EU, and I’m not sure most people, after years of European rebuffs, much care any more. For now, they think of other things: Fatih, for example, who has lived in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn, peppers his speech with references to Fox News and the ‘Bible Belt’ and deeply regrets not having been on the Mavi Marmara. ‘It was once in a lifetime,’ he said. ‘It will prove to be the best example of the struggle for peace. I would definitely go if they did it again. But I don’t think they will.’ He looked at the IHH activists. ‘They are not stupid.’

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement