« | Home | »

Pride in Being Belgian

Tags: |

Last Monday, the Belgian prime minister handed in his resignation to King Albert II and another Belgian government fell. The cause: the withdrawal of a small Flemish party from the Christian Democrat Yves Leterme’s five-party coalition. New legislative elections have yet to be called but in the meantime Belgian politicians have managed to find something they can all agree on.

On Thursday, the lower house of parliament voted almost unanimously (136 deputies out of 138, with two abstentions) to ban the wearing of the full Islamic veil, or niqab, in public places. The legislation doesn’t anywhere actually mention the veil – merely forbidding ‘all clothing completely or mainly hiding the face’ – but no one has suggested that it’s aimed at motorcycle couriers or people whose idea of a good night out is a masked ball. The penalty will be a fine of 15 to 25 euros and/or up to a week in prison – opponents of the veil who describe it as a prison mobile seem to have no problem with putting women who wear one into actual prison if they have their best interests at heart.

Of Belgian’s 10.3 million citizens, 400,000 are Muslims. Let’s say that half of them (almost certainly an overestimate) are women. Of these, it’s possible that as few as 30 of them wear the full veil. And the Belgian police already have the power to stop and caution women with covered faces. In the last year and a half there have been 29 bookings in the whole of the central Brussels-Capital region, although it’s not clear if the warnings were issued to 29 separate women or one very persistent repeat offender.

But let us rejoice with the Liberal deputy Denis Ducarme in this rare moment of Belgian unity:

Our country’s image abroad is more and more incomprehensible, but, at least, in relation to the unanimity this vote in our parliament banning the burqa and niqab in our country will show, there is an element of pride in being Belgian.

Where Belgium leads, many hope, the rest of Europe will follow. Next up is France where, Le Figaro reported on Friday, a draft bill banning the full veil (sorry, ‘clothing intended to hide the face’) in public places will be presented to the council of ministers on 19 May. The fine proposed is a whopping 150 euros, with UMP deputies in favour of a 750-euro fine. Perhaps Belgian members of parliament, especially the Dutch speakers, will feel less pleased with themselves once they see an influx of cheapskate Francophone veiled burqa-wearers from next door.

Comments on “Pride in Being Belgian”

  1. PeterL says:

    Brilliant post. Appaently there is a derogation to the face-hiding law for Carnival-goers, although I’m not sure if this applies to niqab-wearing Carnival-goers. I fancy testing this next-year.

    Seriously though, did we need this further evidence that the Belgian political class should just pack up and go home? How long will it take these guys to abolish themselves? The comments of Mr. Ducarne are beyond parody…

  2. outofdate says:

    In the interest of whatchamacallit, we should also point out that in Saudi Arabia, etc. Some arguments luckily argue themselves while we nip out for a fag.

    • Thomas Jones says:

      I assume you’re not saying that because women are repressed in one way in Saudi Arabia it’s only fair to repress them in a different way in Belgium. But if you’re not saying that, what are you saying?

    • pinhut says:

      The necessary corollary in Saudi Arabia, or indeed any other Muslim country, would be to ban all people from not wearing a full veil.

      • outofdate says:

        There I’ve been struggling to think of a witty reply for half an hour or more, which obviously flies in the face of the point I was making in the first place, so [can we swear on this blog?] it: you win.

  3. Camus123 says:

    The Belgian government has no other problems? Several German Länder have banned teachers from wearing head scarves. A woman with Turkish origins has just been appointed minister in Lower Saxony – hailed as a breakthrough for the four million Muslims. And what did she say to a snide reporter? that crucifixes and head scarves ‘have no place in the class room’. This was smartly fielded by Minister President, who said that she had been misquoted. The German High Court has ruled that indeed crucifixes have no place in classrooms but that doesn’t seem to have been heard. Why headscarves are so subversive escapes me. I’m no friend of the Burkah so I hope that there is a Belgian feminist group that starts to talk to Muslims and even dons the odd head scarf. Echoes of ‘Snow’ by Orhan Pamuk?

  4. A.J.P. Crown says:

    I’m rather looking forward to donning a burkah when I go down the supermarket.

  5. astaire says:

    What does “Liberal” mean, if anything, to M. Ducarme?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement