« | Home | »

The Milibandiad

Tags: | |

David Miliband

David Miliband?

Michael Portillo

Michael Portillo?

The enemies of Gordon Brown are a wonderful company as, God knows, were the enemies of John Major. A government suffers bad shocks, its leader stumbles and attracts a bad press. What government and prime minister do next, over time and rather successfully, may well redeem them with mere voters. But party members in internal opposition at Westminster will have none of it. What follows is suicide bombing – of a genteel and wittering sort.

The Major government, after being hit in September 1992 by an overvalued pound within the ERM, spent the rest of its time – 55 months – overseeing rising inward investment and steadily falling unemployment. But the people who simply knew that Major must go dismissed the distracting economy and went on. They went on indeed until he challenged them, declared a leadership contest – and won it. After which, they resumed going on. It was indeed the economy and they were wonderfully stupid.

They knew by divine revelation not only that Major must go, but that Michael Portillo must succeed him. So it is with Labour now. The Conservative lead falls into single figures, the Liberal Democrats come with mounting credibility into the frame as candidates for a post-election agreement. By-elections stop being hopeless and begin to be won. Cameron, immobile on the banking crisis and with not much idea how the other half lives, metamorphoses into Pigling Bland. Above all, Brown’s handling of the banking crisis is generally applauded for technical grasp and doing the essentials.

At which, the cry goes up: ‘Give us Miliband.’ The object of last week’s Hewitt/Hoon initiative is generally agreed, among people of ill-will, to have been directed at making David Miliband leader. His uneasy silence, the latest of several, was lamented as a sad omission to seize a crown hovering before his anointable hands.

It’s a crude, low, journalistic question, but why? Portillo only made a rather ill-considered speech to conference about the terror potential of the SAS. Miliband, as foreign secretary (not the job it was, but the sort of empty chair that still rates gilt legs), responded to the killing in Gaza a year ago, largely by artillery, of 1200 men, women and children, with another silence.

Yet this rhapsody has been going for years. At the Guardian, Martin Kettle and Polly Toynbee found the new Portillo and have been doing a four-handed John the Baptist act for him since Northern Rock was solvent. The theme has been somewhere between the Dunciad and Iolanthe: ‘He comes! he comes! the sable throne behold’ or ‘Bow, bow, ye lower middle classes!’

In truth, the man is a beautifully modulated void. Moderately young, pleasant spoken, nicely null, he has worked in politics, from outer office to the FO, all his graceful, inconsiderable life. He lacks the zing and flare of Portillo. Yet no metropolitan conversation is complete without him. This is a political Enoch Soames. Come to think of it, this Labour Party may need Enoch Soames.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement