« | Home | »

Half the Argument

Tags: | |

It is hard to know what to make of this week’s Question Time. Most of what happened was fairly predictable. Nick Griffin was a rhetorical mess and the other members of the panel (including David Dimbleby) had clearly come well-prepared with damning quotations and facts. If Griffin hoped to advance his cause – as he believed he could – then he failed. But it is questionable whether that matters. Most of his actual and potential supporters are unlikely to watch Question Time and few people who do watch it would be converted, however brilliantly he performed. The BNP draws such strength as it has (and it is not much) from grievances which are not met by arguments from the facts. That Nick Griffin was shown to be a complete muddlehead won’t influence his supporters one way or the other.

More interesting was the behaviour of the other members of the panel. Jack Straw – of all people – defending racial plurality and liberal tolerance was a sight not seen for many years and the hypocrisy of it left a nasty taste in the mouth. Lady Warsi, the Tory spokesperson, and generally thought to be lightweight by everyone, turned out surprisingly tough, and she is the only British politician I have ever heard point out there is no such thing as a ‘bogus’ asylum seeker. You are either an asylum seeker or not. Bonnie Greer simply rose above the occasion, as expected.

Had Griffin been faster on his feet, however, he could have embarrassed the others. The spokespersons of the three major parties had trouble with one question: is the rise of the BNP due to the failures of the government’s immigration policies? They none of them really answered it – despite repeated proddings from Dimbleby – but they did spend much of their time disputing who had been or would be toughest on immigration, which, however necessary immigration controls might be in practice, in a sense concedes half the argument to the BNP. Although all said how good and necessary immigration was they did not look as though they believed it.

Indeed, the low point came when Chris Huhne of the Lib Dems, anxious to emphasise how incompetent the government was, came close to arguing, perhaps inadvertently, that there was something wrong in the Eastern European migration to Britain. Their general refusal to come clean, of course, was a result of an understandable reluctance to admit that they (and their media allies) had done almost as much to politicise immigration as the BNP. They were also understandably reluctant to admit that many of the grievances BNP supporters have, as victims of what is now the dominant economic ideology, might be legitimate.

Comments on “Half the Argument”

  1. Julia Atkins says:

    Chris Huhne was really the pits, even worse than creepy Straw. Disagree about Bonnie Greer.She was pathetic. Why did they have her on? Best voices came from the audience and had Dimbleby been more on the ball he might have asked the panel where they all stood on Palestine? He and others might have been astonished to hear Griffin vehemently defending Israel against the Palestinians as did the anti-semites from Eastern Europe at gthe Tory Party conference and as does G. Fini, the post-fascist fascist leader in Italy who describes himself as a Zionist and supports the Wall that Sharon built.
    Ross McGibbin is quite right to charge all three mainstream parties with pandering to the tabloid fear-mongering on immigration. Brown was badly wrong-footed on the Gurkha pensions issuer by an actress. Might she not have been better than Bonnie?

  2. Mark C says:

    It’s a shame no one pointed out that whenever the BNP are elected, they turn out to be compeltely useless and do nothing for their constituents. The BNP London Assembly member has largely vanished without trace after being censured for inventing some knife deaths in his constituency in an attmept to demonise black youths.

    • Phil says:

      Yes – I suspect all you can reall achieve with the “when did you stop being a Nazi?” approach is to restrict their target market slightly, from “white right-wingers who want to cast a protest vote and don’t care what people say about the BNP” to “white right-wingers who want to cast a protest vote and specifically don’t care that people say the BNP are Nazis”.

  3. Camus123 says:

    Why do you seem to be so hot under the collar about what was just another radio talk show? Surely, most people will realise what a wally the man is and carefully avoid having anything to do with the BNP.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement