« | Home | »

Oxford’s Got Poetry

Tags: | | | | |

Something that seems to have been overlooked in all the fuss about who is and who isn’t going to succeed Christopher Ricks as the Oxford professor of poetry is the new benchmark that’s been set in voter apathy. After Derek Walcott pulled out of the race, Ruth Padel defeated Arvind Mehrotra by 297 votes to 129: that’s a decisive ratio of 7:3, the kind of winning margin that political leaders, apart from those with the power to fiddle the results, can only dream of. On the other hand, since all graduates of the university are enfranchised, and there must be, at a conservative estimate, at least 100,000 of them walking the earth, the turn-out of 426 amounts to less than 0.5 per cent, which hardly counts as an overwhelming mandate.

Now that Padel has stepped down after less than a week in the chair, admitting she played a ‘naive’ role in the smear campaign that led to Walcott’s withdrawal from the contest, Mehrotra’s supporters are running an email campaign insisting that he should be appointed by default: ‘he has received a significant number of votes, and emerged as a serious contender for the post, therefore, this should be the university’s next logical choice. At least this is how things happen in the democratic world.’ Or to put it another way, the farce has gone on long enough; why not appoint Mehrotra and be done with it?

The university however is planning to run the whole process over again from the beginning. Perhaps this time they should follow the example of such beacons of democracy as Britain’s Got Talent and make it possible for graduates to vote over the internet or by text message: candidates could even read their poems and essays live on ITV1 (oh all right, let’s be realistic, BBC4). That should boost the turn-out. Alternatively, they could simply scrap the whole sham business of ‘electing’ the professor, and leave it to the English faculty to make the appointment. After all, that’s more or less what happened when Joseph Trapp (what do you mean you’ve never heard of him?) got the job in the first place back in 1708.

Comments on “Oxford’s Got Poetry”

  1. HelenDeWitt says:

    Hm. Look. I was an undergraduate at LMH, and I did my doctorate at BNC, and I taught at St Hilda’s and had a JRF at Somerville. I get fundraising appeals from LMH and BNC and from the University, so they know how to find me when they want to. Nobody contacted me to ask me to vote for the Professor of Poetry.

    If they had, Walcott’s past would have made no difference. I think Ezra Pound was an anti-semitic fascist cunt, but if he had been on the ballot for Professor of Poetry, I would still have voted for him against pretty much any contender in the last 100 years. The Internet should have enabled us to tell whether I’m an outlier among the electorate; it seems not to have done.

  2. Thomas Jones says:

    You’re not wrong. (And no one sent me a ballot paper either.) But then again Pound wasn’t much of a democrat, was he…

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement