{"footnote":"  \u003Cp\u003E    There was even an outside super-committee judging all the proposed changes to \u003Cem class=\u0022emphasisClass\u0022\u003EDSM-IV\u003C\/em\u003E, and assessing their validity. For an account of how this worked, and what    counts as validity in these circles, see \u0026lsquo;A History of the DSM-5 Scientific Review Committee\u0026rsquo;, written by the chairman, Kenneth S. Kendler, and forthcoming in the journal \u003Cem class=\u0022emphasisClass\u0022\u003EPsychological Medicine\u003C\/em\u003E.  \u003C\/p\u003E\n","audio":[],"video":[]}