{"footnote":"\u003Cp\u003E  Norris has recently published yet another set of rigorously demystificatory exercises in \u003Cem class=\u0022emphasisClass\u0022\u003EDeconstruction and the Interests of Theory\u003C\/em\u003E (Pinter, 250 pp., \u0026pound;25, November  1988, 0 86187 7128). They show, among other things, that he is not unwilling to be rigorously demystificatory about the very Theory which ought itself to be so, especially when it is put to  right-wing or \u0026lsquo;irrationalist\u0026rsquo; purposes, or does its own demystifying with insufficient philosophical rigour. The chapters exhibit a considerable range of interests \u0026ndash; from Bloch and Adorno on music,  de Man on Kierkegaard, and Rudolf Gasch\u0026eacute; on de Man, to Pope and Shakespeare post-structurally considered. Norris himself emerges as a demystified left-wing rationalist.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","audio":[],"video":[]}