« | Home | »

Forever Not England

Tags: | | |

Sutton Hoo © Marc Atkins/marcatkins.com

Sutton Hoo © Marc Atkins/marcatkins.com

The photographer Marc Atkins and I are working on a project called Fields of England. We go into fields we have known for a long time, and others we just know about, but have never seen: battlefields, minefields, deserted village fields, fields undersea, gathering places, burial grounds, places of execution, places where treaties have been signed – but this is a list of field-genres. If we have learned one thing, it is the limitation of genre. There are as many genres as there are fields. And almost as many Englands.

The best way to approach Sutton Hoo is from the river. The larger mounds on the ridge above the east bank of the Deben were designed to be seen from ships nosing up the channel after their journey from Sweden. Suffolk and Sweden were the only places in Europe where ship-burial was practised around the year 600 AD. At Sutton Hoo, the ship-biers were dragged from ten feet above sea level to an elevation of one hundred feet in less than half a mile. The gut-wrenching effort is a measure of East Anglian stubbornness at a time when pagan burial customs were being replaced by Christian funerary rites in other parts of the country. Two of the mounds at Sutton Hoo contained ships. The larger of them was more than ninety feet long and contained the richest grave goods ever found in Britain.

The historical records for the period are scant and retrospective, and there is nothing conclusive in what was dug up to identify the occupant of Mound 1 – the body showed up in the dig as a patch of different-coloured earth – though it is reasonable to suppose he was a Wuffing (the name given to all the East Anglian kings). The most popular nominee has always been Rædwald, king from 599 to 625. His name was put forward by Hector Chadwick, who visited the first excavation in 1939, and the idea has stuck, possibly because more is known about Rædwald than the other candidates, and what is known makes a good story.

The historical evidence is incomplete, the art historical evidence allows for an earlier date, the carbon dating allows for both earlier and later, and the most promising dating equipment, a bag of Frankish coins, was assigned initially to c.650; the subsequent back-dating, carried out in 1960, was jiggled, rather remarkably, to 625 precisely. But it does not much matter whether they pushed the boat out – or in – for Rædwald, or for some other Frankish coin collector, since the culture would have been the same.

Bede says that Rædwald converted to Christianity on a visit to Kent, the first of the English kingdoms to import the new faith, but got such a frosty reception on his return home that he built a new temple with altars to both Jesus and the Devil. Whether he was Rædwald or not, there was very little in the occupant of Mound 1’s post-mortem kit to indicate that he had staked much on the chances of a Christian afterlife: only a pair of spoons, inscribed ‘Saulos’ and ‘Paulos’, which may suggest an amiable willingness to do the conversion job properly, if it came to it, rather than a solid conviction that the first attempt had actually worked.

The spoons do not figure much among all the other stuff: the helmet, the bundles of spears and angons, the lyre in its beaver-skin bag, the ceremonial whetstone, the pair of shoes (size 7), and the largest hoard of late Roman silver from the Eastern Mediterranean ever found in Northern Europe. And then the coins, which Philip Grierson thought were to pay the ferryman, or rather a spectral crew to man the ship. The coins were all foreign because they could not have been anything else; there was no mint anywhere in England at the time – the last moment before the country asserted its island identity with its own currency. The man in Mound 1 was no islander; his business interests and family connections were across the North Sea, out in the shipping lanes.

The Visitor Centre allows for this, though its final annexe is devoted to the Kingdom of East Anglia 500-869 AD. This caters to local patriotism, but also to a grander ambition that regards East Anglia as the seed-bed for a national character that gradually encroached on the rest of England. The earliest runic inscription in Old English yet discovered was found at Caistor-by-Norwich. It dates from the fifth century, or even the fourth, raising the possibility of an intriguing overlap with the Roman presence. The evidence is inscribed on a foot-bone from the skeleton of a roe deer, and consists, helpfully enough, of the word for roe deer, raihun, a detail that put a spring in the steps of a pair of Tolkien-enthusiasts ahead of me in the tour of the display cabinets.

But it’s worth remembering that the version of English spoken by Rædwald also evolved into Swedish, not to mention Danish, Norwegian, German and Dutch. There is a case for saying that Sutton Hoo does not mark the beginnings of Englishness, but its end: no money, no Christianity, no island mentality. Whoever was buried in Mound 1 did not die in the ship, but he did live in one, conceptually – his people were joined by the sea, not bounded by it.

Present-day access to the site is by car to the Visitor Centre, then on foot through a small, crooked avenue of thorn trees, onto a tableland where there are acres of polythene-covered crops and a small roped-off area, which is where the mounds are. Only one of them now commands rather than solicits attention. Rebuilt in 1993, steep-sided and picturesque with gorse, it looks down on the others which have all slumped sideways after centuries of ploughing. Anti-glider trenches from the Second World War run across the heritage features. On a stormy spring day, larks swing across the bright windy spaces above, and there is the savour of salt in the air. The cloud anvils are pale to the west, and dark to the east. Not-Rædwald, progenitor of Not-England, no longer even darkens the soil.

Comments on “Forever Not England”

  1. Edward Weldon says:

    Sutton Hoo is remarkable for its unspectacular ordinariness;- there is nothing to see. I recomend a visit and I mean it. Looking for the place in the car is an adventure in itself, sea-frett and drizzle will add to its magical atmospere. However, I’m not convinced Raedwald was much of a eurocentric. The Anglo-Saxons being responsible for the destruction of Roman Britain,
    classical culture & civilisation not to mention centralised european government. Raedwald was Ukip.

    • Higgs Boatswain says:

      What was responsible for the destruction of Roman Britain was events on the other side of Europe: the motley bunch of barbarians who crossed the Rhine in 407, followed by the Visigothic invasion of Italy and the Vandal capture of Spain and North Africa. Roman Britain was long over by the time the first Anglo Saxons appeared on the scene, and if there was ever an insular, inward-looking period in British history it is those dark decades between the withdrawal of the legions and the appearance of the new invaders. Or at least, so it seems: Gildas paints a grim picture of petty tyrannies and internecine squabbles, and the barbarians in the north and west periodically spilled over the remains of Hadrian’s Wall to raid and harry the remaining towns.

      The Anglo-Saxons linked Britain to the continent once again: first with migration and by marriage, and then – once they were converted to Christianity – with energetic missions to their pagan brethren in what is now Germany and the Low Countries. Though gradually English, the Anglo-Saxons were never europhobes – English kings never forgot their loyalty to the Pope, and Alfred himself translated Gregory’s ‘Pastoral Care.’ Offa cultivated the friendship of Charlemagne, and the Anglo-Saxon church embraced European-style monastic reform in the tenth century. Even the great Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulf – ostensibly dating from the period of Raedwald and the settlements – is set not in England but in Geatland, in southern Sweden. (The Sutton Hoo grave also contained Byzantine silver, in cluding those Greek apostle spoons, as well as many objects that have analogies only in Scandinavia).

      None of which is to say that the Anglo-Saxons were Europhiles – ‘Europe’ didn’t exist until at least the High Middle Ages – but they certainly weren’t UKIP either. There was no centralised European government in the early medieval period, but there were certainly common markets and strong cultural, religious and personal links between Britain and the Continent. The Anglo-Saxons were part of this exchange; they did not put an end to it. In that respect at least you might say they have something in common with the Brexiteers.

      • Pangur says:

        The first part of Beowulf is set in Leyre in Denmark. Grendel a monster has been terrorizing the Danes in King Hrothgar’s hall called Heorot (=hart). Hrothgar King of the Danes is visited by the young Geatish hero Beowulf, who eventually slays both Grendel and the monster’s mother. The second part is indeed situated in Geatland, Southern Sweden.

  2. John Cowan says:

    The only modern descendants of Old English are Modern English and Modern Scots. The other Germanic languages are cousins, not descendants, although some of them have influenced Modern English vocabulary heavily: such words as uncle, sky, and even them are Norse, for example. Common Germanic was spoken perhaps a thousand years earlier on the Continent.

    As it happens, the word ᚱᚨᛇᚺᚨᚾ raïhan ‘roe (deer)’ could be either Old English or Old Norse, and it is written in Common Germanic / Old Norse runes rather than specifically in Old English runes, which came later. Because of this, the bone may in fact be an import from Denmark.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • piffin on Who supplied the gun?: It's a shame our fire-safety regulations aren't equally well admired.
    • Lashenden on Who supplied the gun?: Legally buying any firearm in the UK is very far from being 'scarily easy'. Despite much media misinformation, the misuse of legally held firearms by ...
    • Stu Bry on Sorry Not Sorry: Labour did not win this election but have a realistic path to a majority in the next one whenever that may be. They have also taken away the Tory majo...
    • kadinsky on Sorry Not Sorry: It's the strategies of his PLP critics that ought to be examined and questioned. If they hadn't monstered him for two years Labor would likely be in g...
    • woll on Sorry Not Sorry: A little self-righteous? Corbyn did better than expected but did not win or come near winning, against a very poor Tory campaign. In addition, in vari...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement