« | Home | »

Valentino

Tags:

I went with my girlfriend to see Prince play Madison Square Garden in 2010, a day or two before New Year’s Eve, on our last day in New York before moving out to the West Coast. I remember a snowstorm – the cabs wouldn’t take us back to Queens afterwards – but it was so worth it. Thanks to miraculous strokes of good fortune, we had excellent seats, directly in front of James McNew and his bandmates – who seemed a bit miffed, to be honest. But: there was Prince! He played for a long time and at some point my friend went to the bathroom. Just then, Prince started locking-and-popping – which wasn’t something I’d have thought Prince even did.

I read, in the gush of remembrances since his death yesterday, that Prince’s father had taken him when he was very young to see James Brown, and that Prince had danced for the maestro. If so, this is beautiful. (The one video there is of Prince, Brown and Michael Jackson together, onstage, is low-res but highly enjoyable.) I read, also, that grown-up Prince had given his cock the name ‘Valentino’.

I read remembrances, too, about Prince’s work as a Jehovah’s Witness. But this had always made sense. He was a devout man who wrote sad, devout songs for lost lovers and fucky, devout songs for new acquaintances. ‘Sometimes I stand in awe of what I do myself,’ he once said. ‘I feel like a regular person, but I listen to this and wonder, where did it come from? I believe definitely in the higher power that gave me this talent. If you could go in the studio alone and come out with that, you’d do it every day, wouldn’t you?’

‘When Purple Rain came out,’ Dan Piepenbring wrote on the Paris Review’s blog in 2010:

Prince was all slashes: black/white, straight/gay, male/female, rock/R&B, voluptuary/ascetic, cocaine/peyote, garish/understated, Hendrix/Little Richard, gothic/ecstatic, authoritarian/anarchist, apocalyptic/Panglossian, hip/square, selfish/selfless. Any thesis about him came bundled with its antithesis. He was so at odds with himself that the odds synthesised into one whole, perplexing person.

‘Prince’s concept was James Brown, Jimi Hendrix and Charlie Chaplin,’ said Miles Davis.

At Madison Square Garden, Prince turned out to be insanely great at locking-and-popping. It was mind-blowing, one of the sexiest things that I’d seen. My girlfriend, when she came back from the bathroom, didn’t quite believe me. But ‘supremely great dancer’ isn’t even on Prince’s CV. Neither is insanely great roller skater, ping-pong player, tennis player, basketball player, maker of 5 a.m. pancakes – though he seems to have been all these things, among others we’ll never know about. I wasn’t surprised to read about Prince’s 40-hour tantric sex sessions. Nothing about the man is surprising. Most of the stories turn out to be true. But it had never hit me, full-force, that Prince had played every note on every one of his albums. He really was a sexy motherfucker.

A few days after the show in New York, at a New Year’s dinner with friends in California, the musical question was asked: ‘Would you fuck Prince?’ ‘Of course!’ we all said, until we got to my girlfriend who, all by her lonesome, demurred. But then she hadn’t seen Prince lock and pop.

Comments on “Valentino”

  1. *This piece was originally titled “Sexy Motherfucker.”
    ** Every note on every one of his albums = poetic license, but basically true.
    ***I spilled whiskey on my keyboard while writing this last night/Now it’s sticky as fuck.

  2. zbs says:

    Is there a citation for the “Valentino” bit? I am concerned for what exactly he was putting in Susanna Hoffs’ mouth in the first verse of “Manic Monday.”

  3. I got it from New York Magazine (Bill Wyman’s piece, I think?), which did reference “Manic Monday!” Dirty minds.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andrewjmc on Why did Labour MPs vote with the government?: With reference to the support of working class Labour supporters in Brexity areas: Professor John Curtice, who's generally believed to know a thing or...
    • alpan on When Yes Means No: Ayşe Zarakol is generally on point, though I'm not sure what is gained by labeling the whole event a "foregone conclusion." Buna ne gerek vardı ger...
    • andrewjmc on May’s Gambit: @semitone: Professor John Curtice doesn't think you're right about Labour voters in Leave constituencies voting 'Leave'. He thinks it may be a politic...
    • Nick on May’s Gambit: There is also the timing of the Brexit negotiations themselves. Those around the Cabinet table may have started out by believing their own rhetoric, ...
    • deano on The Usual Rhetoric: US itself has never been shy of using chemical weapons, even nukes in SE Asia, Japan, etc. Justification being it helped to *save* lives..

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement