« | Home | »

The Voice of Moderation

Tags: |

Most newspapers and magazines these days (including, yes, the LRB) send out barrages of emails in their campaigns to lure readers into subscribing. Sometimes it’s hard to tell, though, what exactly they want readers for, or what exactly it is they think they are offering them: ‘news’ hardly seems the word for a lot of it. Nothing wrong with taking a line, of course, but there’s a difference between taking a line and crossing one. No prizes for guessing which paper sent out the following bundle of headlines.

Rotherham child abuse gang leader wanted IVF
Pupils who go private get ahead by two years
City lawyer in court over ‘sex outside station’
Peerages for Cameron supporters in EU referendum campaign
‘Meddling’ Britain feels wrath of Iran
Refugees can be cleared from Jungle, French court decides

After ‘news’ comes ‘opinion’, so they’re distinguished in someone’s mind at least. Top of the list is Melanie Phillips: ‘Project Fear looks more like mafia blackmail.’ (By ‘Project Fear’ she means the campaign to keep Britain in the EU.)

Two of three ‘must reads’:

Blow for Cameron as migration reaches ‘new norm’ of 320,000 – three times more than the government’s target

The Savile Inquiry report was finally published yesterday: Five BBC staff missed chances to end his decades of depravity, but Liz Kershaw argues the report’s author has let the Corporation’s top management off the hook

And right at the top, the must read of must reads:

The rise of the swivel-eyed activist is giving ordinary voters unpalatable choices, says Philip Collins, so if the prospect of Trump or Corbyn in power scares you, it’s time to make sure that the voice of moderation is heard

Which paper sent out this edifying array of enticements? That’s right: the voice of moderation itself, the paper of record, Rupert Murdoch’s Times.

Comments

  1. Graucho says:

    Lot of column inches and media stories about the tax affairs of Google, Starbucks Amazon et al. Precious little about Mr Rupert Murdoch. Is there a reason ? I think we should be told.

  2. ejh says:

    It’s a shame it doesn’t shout louder about its recent habit of running stridently pro-Saudi Arabia comment pieces from the likes of Rogers Boyes.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Coldish on Why We Strike: My capacity for sympathy with the concerns of the university staff is tempered by the fact that even after more than 25 years continuous direct part-t...
    • mildly_baffled on Why We Strike: Seems like the financial realities that have raped private sector pension provision in the last decade, are finally catching up with academia - using ...
    • Waseem Yaqoob on Why We Strike: The final salary scheme for university staff was closed in 2011. The USS pension scheme is not funded out of general taxation; it is not a public sect...
    • bidem on Why We Strike: Final salary pension schemes have almost disappeared in the private sector. Basically because they are too expensive. It is inevitable that similar p...
    • Joefarrell on Fischia il vento: The rise of racism and the resurgence of Fascism in Italy is nauseating and worrying, but Italians are justified in complaining that they have had to ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement