« | Home | »

The Voice of Moderation

Tags: |

Most newspapers and magazines these days (including, yes, the LRB) send out barrages of emails in their campaigns to lure readers into subscribing. Sometimes it’s hard to tell, though, what exactly they want readers for, or what exactly it is they think they are offering them: ‘news’ hardly seems the word for a lot of it. Nothing wrong with taking a line, of course, but there’s a difference between taking a line and crossing one. No prizes for guessing which paper sent out the following bundle of headlines.

Rotherham child abuse gang leader wanted IVF
Pupils who go private get ahead by two years
City lawyer in court over ‘sex outside station’
Peerages for Cameron supporters in EU referendum campaign
‘Meddling’ Britain feels wrath of Iran
Refugees can be cleared from Jungle, French court decides

After ‘news’ comes ‘opinion’, so they’re distinguished in someone’s mind at least. Top of the list is Melanie Phillips: ‘Project Fear looks more like mafia blackmail.’ (By ‘Project Fear’ she means the campaign to keep Britain in the EU.)

Two of three ‘must reads’:

Blow for Cameron as migration reaches ‘new norm’ of 320,000 – three times more than the government’s target

The Savile Inquiry report was finally published yesterday: Five BBC staff missed chances to end his decades of depravity, but Liz Kershaw argues the report’s author has let the Corporation’s top management off the hook

And right at the top, the must read of must reads:

The rise of the swivel-eyed activist is giving ordinary voters unpalatable choices, says Philip Collins, so if the prospect of Trump or Corbyn in power scares you, it’s time to make sure that the voice of moderation is heard

Which paper sent out this edifying array of enticements? That’s right: the voice of moderation itself, the paper of record, Rupert Murdoch’s Times.

Comments on “The Voice of Moderation”

  1. Graucho says:

    Lot of column inches and media stories about the tax affairs of Google, Starbucks Amazon et al. Precious little about Mr Rupert Murdoch. Is there a reason ? I think we should be told.

  2. ejh says:

    It’s a shame it doesn’t shout louder about its recent habit of running stridently pro-Saudi Arabia comment pieces from the likes of Rogers Boyes.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • rncgray on Thomas Bewick’s Sketchbook: Somewhat reminiscent of the classic physicist's reductionist mindset "Imagine a sphericaL cow..."
    • KdW on Diplomatic Protection: The Thomson Reuters Foundation is hardly an illicit organisation. Not that I have any specific information, but there are plenty of people there who d...
    • RobotBoy on On Muhal Richard Abrams: A very welcome tribute to a remarkable artist and organizer. One of the greatest crimes committed against jazz by 'Jazz', the Ken Burns documentary,...
    • Phil Edwards on In Bloomsbury Square: "Further everywhere" is lovely, but I suspect a closer English equivalent would be "all points beyond", or more simply "all other places" - the locuti...
    • judgefloyd on An Unfolding Humanitarian Emergency: When it looked like this citizenship rule had only affected the Greens, the government was very snooty about it, with a government senator tweeting hi...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement