« | Home | »

The Voice of Moderation

Tags: |

Most newspapers and magazines these days (including, yes, the LRB) send out barrages of emails in their campaigns to lure readers into subscribing. Sometimes it’s hard to tell, though, what exactly they want readers for, or what exactly it is they think they are offering them: ‘news’ hardly seems the word for a lot of it. Nothing wrong with taking a line, of course, but there’s a difference between taking a line and crossing one. No prizes for guessing which paper sent out the following bundle of headlines.

Rotherham child abuse gang leader wanted IVF
Pupils who go private get ahead by two years
City lawyer in court over ‘sex outside station’
Peerages for Cameron supporters in EU referendum campaign
‘Meddling’ Britain feels wrath of Iran
Refugees can be cleared from Jungle, French court decides

After ‘news’ comes ‘opinion’, so they’re distinguished in someone’s mind at least. Top of the list is Melanie Phillips: ‘Project Fear looks more like mafia blackmail.’ (By ‘Project Fear’ she means the campaign to keep Britain in the EU.)

Two of three ‘must reads’:

Blow for Cameron as migration reaches ‘new norm’ of 320,000 – three times more than the government’s target

The Savile Inquiry report was finally published yesterday: Five BBC staff missed chances to end his decades of depravity, but Liz Kershaw argues the report’s author has let the Corporation’s top management off the hook

And right at the top, the must read of must reads:

The rise of the swivel-eyed activist is giving ordinary voters unpalatable choices, says Philip Collins, so if the prospect of Trump or Corbyn in power scares you, it’s time to make sure that the voice of moderation is heard

Which paper sent out this edifying array of enticements? That’s right: the voice of moderation itself, the paper of record, Rupert Murdoch’s Times.

Comments

  1. Graucho says:

    Lot of column inches and media stories about the tax affairs of Google, Starbucks Amazon et al. Precious little about Mr Rupert Murdoch. Is there a reason ? I think we should be told.

  2. ejh says:

    It’s a shame it doesn’t shout louder about its recent habit of running stridently pro-Saudi Arabia comment pieces from the likes of Rogers Boyes.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • adriennecox on Who gets to tell Iraq’s history?: Another note, not only did the NY Times benefit from the content, it formed the basis for special marleting offers - readers who subscribe got “ear...
    • requiemapache on Swapsies and Shinies: I'm not a football fan; haircuts, cab rides and casual bar conversation are a perennial ordeal of taut smiles and firm redirection. I also couldn'...
    • Dectora on Who gets to tell Iraq’s history?: This is a very important issue. Some years ago my husband, then teaching at the University of London, was asked to sit on a committee to decide whethe...
    • Ally on In Memoriam GSA: For the institutional context, it is worth reading not only the same author's 2014 "Architectural Review" article, linked in this article, but also Ei...
    • Stu Bry on A New Standard for the Gulf States: If the UK or any other western government was serious about this issue they would be sanctioning any company which is involved in labour abuses in the...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement