« | Home | »

On Chantal Akerman

Tags: |

Chantal Akerman in Je, tu, il, elle (1976)

Chantal Akerman in Je, tu, il, elle (1976)

Chantal Akerman’s films don’t have conventional plots with a beginning, middle and end. Yet nearly all the obituaries, following her death at the age of 65 this month, described how Akerman was inspired to make her first film at the age of 18 after watching Godard’s Pierrot le Fou, and said that Gus Van Sant cited Akerman as one of his major inspirations. Over and over, we were given her genesis as a filmmaker and the promise of her reincarnation, bookended by two credible male auteurs.

Her death, too, was cast as part of the narrative. Akerman committed suicide; the obituary writers implied it had something to do with her final public appearance in mid-August, when the preview of No Home Movie was booed at the Locarno film festival. But Akerman was never dismayed by criticism; she thrived on it. During the Cannes preview of the three-and-a-half-hour Jeanne Dielman (1975), now considered a classic of feminist counter-cinema, Akerman recalled the rebounding of fold-up seats as audience members walked out, and Marguerite Duras shouting on her way to the exit that Akerman was crazy. Akerman gave as good as she got until the film’s star, Delphine Seyrig, urged her to sit down. She never lost her taste for tragicomic confrontation; at Locarno this August, her response to the booing was to say: ‘It was a great film, no?’

This self-aware sense of humour was an abiding characteristic of Akerman’s public persona. In a recent interview, she laughed as she described how some of the films she made in New York in the 1970s had been financed with money stolen from the 55th Street Playhouse, the gay porn cinema in Manhattan where she worked as a cashier. (The padding from the dollar bills kept her warm walking home, she said.) Her first film, Saute ma ville (1968), was self-financed. To secure funding from the Belgian government for Jeanne Dielman, she submitted a much shorter script with a more conventional feminist message.

Akerman always insisted that she made ‘Chantal Akerman films’ and was no porte-drapeau (standard-bearer) for a particular brand of feminism. This may sound like an abnegation of responsibility, but Akerman’s early films are as distant from the feminism of the time as they are from traditional linear cinema. She refused to give her characters a cohesive, easily recognisable identity.

In Je, tu, il, elle (1976), the main character, played by Akerman, gives a hand-job to a male truck driver and engages in a stark seven-minute lesbian sex scene that ends the film. The title character of Jeanne Dielman is both a housewife and a sex worker and, by the end, a murderer. Many of Akerman’s displays of exposed bodies could be isolated pieces of feminist performance art; in some ways, she was less like Agnès Varda than Marina Abramović. As she put it, the idea of a single language of feminist film ‘is like saying there is only one way for women to express themselves. But there should be as many different ways as there are different kinds of women making films.’

There was a pragmatic side to Akerman’s feminism. She aimed for an 80 per cent female crew, employing women in roles normally fulfilled by men (cinematographers, lighting technicians, sound recordists) so that a literal or metaphorical male gaze didn’t dictate the shots. She shot at her own eye level so that ‘the camera was not voyeuristic’: ‘You always knew where I was. You know that it wasn’t shot through a keyhole.’ And when she’s playing one of her characters, Akerman often stares directly back into the camera for an uncomfortable length of time: as relentless, confrontational and provocative on-screen as off.

Comments

  1. Do you have a source for Akerman’s on-stage response to the boos in Locarno? Because as far as I’m aware all booing (the extent of which has been overstated dramatically) was confined to the press screening, which Akerman was not present at. I’d also be interested to see the interview where she says A Couch in New York was funded by money stolen from a porn cinema. She worked as a cashier in a porn cinema when she went to the US in the early 70s, but A Couch in New York was made in 1996. Unless she missed her old job and decided to return for a few shifts twenty years later, I’d suggest that low-budget films like La chambre, Hôtel Monterey or News From Home are more likely to have been funded by that money than a glossy romantic comedy starring Juliet Binoche and William Hurt.

    • Thomas Jones says:

      You’re quite right about the movies funded by the cash from the porn cinema; that was a transcription error, now corrected, with a link to the interview (also here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUStWsegZ0k). The sentence about responding to the booing has been changed too: Akerman was speaking at a different event at Locarno, but the point that the booing would hardly have driven her to suicide, as the obituary writers implied, still stands.

  2. Selekt says:

    Jeanne Dielman was not sponsored by the French, but by the Belgian Government.

  3. eric de kuyper says:

    Some more precise details about Chantal’s debut and financing! I showed
    Saute ma Ville in my tv program (De Andere Film) on the flemish television (BRT). Not much money, but anyway…
    Then she tried to shoot l’Enfant Trouvé in the South of France…
    After a stay in NY she came back with Hotel Monterey.

    Again I was glad to be able to show it in my program (and Chantal was happy with the money too). Big problem: the film was totally silent. So I put… Mozart’s Don Giovanni as a sound track on it.

    If you want to know about these first years of her career, please look at Necs and my interview with Annie van den Oever.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Coldish on Why We Strike: My capacity for sympathy with the concerns of the university staff is tempered by the fact that even after more than 25 years continuous direct part-t...
    • mildly_baffled on Why We Strike: Seems like the financial realities that have raped private sector pension provision in the last decade, are finally catching up with academia - using ...
    • Waseem Yaqoob on Why We Strike: The final salary scheme for university staff was closed in 2011. The USS pension scheme is not funded out of general taxation; it is not a public sect...
    • bidem on Why We Strike: Final salary pension schemes have almost disappeared in the private sector. Basically because they are too expensive. It is inevitable that similar p...
    • Joefarrell on Fischia il vento: The rise of racism and the resurgence of Fascism in Italy is nauseating and worrying, but Italians are justified in complaining that they have had to ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement