« | Home | »

More Effective than Airstrikes

Tags: | |

A few years ago, an Israeli F16 fighter pilot I know went on a training exercise for a possible attack on Iran’s nuclear reactors. When he got back I asked him if such an operation could actually succeed. He said he thought Israel had the capacity to carry it out, but the military leadership was against it. When I asked him why, he explained that even if an airstrike were completely successful, the Iranians would be able to rebuild their reactors within two years. The operation, he said, would only work if sanctions were intensified immediately after the attack, and most sanctioning countries would be unlikely to agree to that. He concluded by pointing out that Iran would probably retaliate against Israel, and ‘while it is easy to get into such a bloody game, it is completely unclear how to get out.’

The recent deal – assuming it’s approved by US and Iranian legislators – will accomplish more than the Israeli military would have been able to. Rather than two years, Tehran’s nuclear development will be stalled for a decade or more, and a new front with Iran has been taken off the table. This is probably the reason most IDF generals are uncharacteristically reticent about the agreement: they know it is advantageous but are afraid of upsetting the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, and his supporters in the United States.

Comments

  1. Sharoni says:

    Any currently serving IDF genearls are reticent because they’re soldiers, not elected politicians and not supposed to and do not comment on political decisions or critize the elected government. They are not being uncharacteristically recticent.

    • akvartany says:

      Generals, security experts of a democratic country do and have the right to air their opinions and not follow orders when a fanatic is running the country. Only wish Hitlers generals had guts to do so as the Israeli one’s have done. many lives may have been saved.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Timothy Rogers on Fifa v. the FBI: What stake the US has in the ongoing tragicomedy of the FiFa World-Cup selection process is unclear. There is still no mass market for the sport in t...
    • Timothy Rogers on One Cubit the More: Yes, the talk (or essay) was a deliberative, thoughtful one. The cubit is used as a quantitative measure to indicate the amount of scientific knowled...
    • AndrewL on One Cubit the More: Thank you for the link, Timothy. I must admit, I had naively assumed it would be a "shoulders of giants" talk too, but it is so much better than that...
    • Timothy Rogers on One Cubit the More: Here is the link to the talk, which was published in the August 1963 issue of Encounter. It is really about intellectual modesty and clarity about ou...
    • AndrewL on One Cubit the More: In case anyone else is looking for the original Bible verse, as I was, I think it is Matthew 6:27: "Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit t...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement