« | Home | »

Episode Eight: Unicorns

Tags: | |

I’m having trouble suspending my disbelief at the Labour manifesto. The party promises that it will:

Cut the deficit every year
Raise the state pension by whichever is the highest of inflation, average earnings or 2.5 per cent
Protect spending on health, education and foreign aid
Hire an additional 8000 GPs, 20,000 nurses and 3000 midwives
‘Guarantee people a GP appointment within 48 hours, and on the same day for those who need it’
Reduce tuition fees
Not raise basic or higher rate income tax, or VAT, or National Insurance
Give every child a free unicorn
Make rich people, tax avoiders and non-doms pay for it all

I made up one of those promises. If you’re trying to guess which is fictional, here’s a clue: not the most unlikely.


  1. Phil Edwards says:

    I think it is the most unlikely, considering that it’s a factual impossibility.

    Anything about economic growth in there? As I understood it Labour’s secret weapon was going to be a quiet return to Keynes, on the basis that five years of X% of Y will pay for an awful lot more if Y is larger every year. Shame if they’re keeping it so quiet they’re not going to tell anyone.

    But “we can’t afford decent services” is and always has been a Tory line, adopted for public consumption to justify an ideologically-driven attack on the public sector. The question isn’t whether it’s possible for Labour to deliver, it’s whether they will the means.

  2. streetsj says:

    Can the unicorn go in a junior ISA?

  3. rupert moloch says:

    Well it’ll certainly attract the support of unicorn breeders. Their industry has been in the doldrums for years.

  4. rupert moloch says:

    Better yet, why not nationalise unicorn breeding?

  5. Timothy Rogers says:

    How does “protecting spending on foreign aid” fit into the overall idea of protecting spending on existing domestic programs designed “to share the wealth” and produce more fairness and social justice? I just don’t get it. “Justice at home” may have to mean parsimony abroad.
    Also, how much would the defense budget have to be cut in order to fund the health-care hiring expansion and the reduction of tuition? If it can be done, it should be done, though it would violate phony pieties that cluster around the holiest of holies (“national security”, of course) like flies on dung.

  6. gcsmith says:

    maybe they’re not going to renew trident? that would pay for a few unicorns

  7. Olaf Olsen says:

    The fantasy of making the rich pay is very droll, but the word Lanchester wants is fictitious, not fictional. Sorry to be petty.

  8. John-Albert says:

    Making the rich pay? There’s an idea. We’ve never done that on this side of the water.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Simon Wood on The Little Island that Could: Four powerful paras, Stu. I hadn't seen the Kundera letter and I have to say I giggled at the signatories - this was truly la crème de la crème. But...
    • Stu Bry on The Little Island that Could: The idea that Brexit is a parochial folly is very naive. It is part of the same discontent that drove Scottish independence close to a majority, that ...
    • Joe Morison on The Little Island that Could: It’s certainly looking more likely, but it’s not over till it’s over. Corbyn appears to be going to May’s aid; but, perhaps, as Steve Bell su...
    • mauisurfer on The Little Island that Could: Here is what Putin actually said about Brexit when he was asked at his annual news conference: quote let them decide this for themselves, this is no...
    • Rod Miller on Where are the protesters?: There's a happy medium somewhere between mediaeval serfdom and bling-worshipping, overpopulated, climate-busting, mass-extinction-summoning overindulg...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive