« | Home | »

Fattypuffs and Thinifers

Tags: | | |

James Gillray, 'John Bull taking a Luncheon', 1798

James Gillray, ‘John Bull taking a Luncheon’, 1798

In André Maurois’s 1930 children’s novel Patapoufs et Filifers (translated by Rosemary Benét as Fattypuffs and Thinifers in 1940), Terry and Edmund are the children of Mr and Mrs Double. Terry, like his father, is thin; Edmund, like his mother, isn’t. One day, the inseparable brothers descend into an underworld where you’re either a Fattypuff or a Thinifer. The brothers are therefore divided, one packed off to Thiniville, the other to Fattyborough.

Terry is amazed among the Thinifers:

There wasn’t a single one who was fat, or even moderately plump. All of them – men, women, and children were dreadfully, dreadfully thin. One could see the bones through their cheeks. There was no flesh on their hands, and their clothes hung losely about them… ‘Where am I?’ Terry wondered.

Jean Bruller’s illustrations depict a Thinifer population so thin that their faces make sense only in profile.

fattypuffs and thinifers

On board Edmund’s boat are three-dimensional people:

The sailors… strolled casually about, some with their hands in their pockets, and others eating bits of bread and chocolate, or perhaps a piece of sausage or the wing of a chicken. Up on the bridge was the captain. He was seated in an armchair with a table beside him laden with cakes and things to eat. Everybody – captain, sailors and passengers – looked happy and good-humoured.

Edmund is a given a history of Fattypuffs, but his indoctrination into the foundation myths of Fattyborough is interrupted by hot chocolate. Terry learns about the history of the Thinifers. The boys are witnesses to a falling out between the Thinifers and the Fattypuffs, which leads to war, followed by reconciliation, and the recognition that Fattypuffs and Thinifers are better all round if they mingle with one another.

Maurois would go on to write about a real war in Why France Fell (1941), but his fictional divide according to girth wasn’t so new. In Bonaparte and the British: Prints and Propaganda in the Age of Napoleon, a cartoon show at the British Museum, Bonaparte is often ‘Bony’ or ‘Boney’, while John Bull is forever a Fattypuff. Even when the British aren’t depicted as John-Bull fat they’re still at it, eating and drinking, drinking and eating, always maintaining their own heavy but even keel. In Gillray’s John Bull taking a Luncheon an enormous Bull feasts on French battleships served to him by the commanders who had defeated Napoleon in the Mediterranean. Bonaparte by contrast is not only typically thin, but often ill. In a cartoon by Isaac Cruikshank he stands on the Pas de Calais, vomiting at one end, farting at the other: the caption is ‘Bonne Farte Raising a Southerly Wind’.

Bonne Farte raising a Southerly Wind

It’s not only John Bull who is fat; so is Britannia. In The First Kiss this Ten Years, the cartoon made by Gillray to mark the halt in the Anglo-French wars after the Treaty of Amiens (1802), a thin Napoleon stoops to kiss a spherical Britannia. ‘Madame,’ he says, ‘permit to me pay my profound esteem to your engaging person, and to seal on your divine lips my everlasting attachment.’ ‘Monsieur,’ she replies, ‘you are truly a well-bred gentleman, and though you make me blush, yet you kiss so delicately that I cannot refuse you, though I was sure you would deceive me again.’ In an anonymous print of 1803, Napoleon is depicted as man who has tried to swallow the whole world, only the globe has got stuck in his mouth.

With Napoleon defeated in 1815, a French cartoonist depicts an Englishman arriving and then leaving France. in the first he hops from a ship straight into a kitchen; in the second, his stomach has to be supported by a wheelbarrow so he can board the ship and return home. Victory was fat, but loss was always thin.

The first Kiss this Ten Years

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • piffin on Who supplied the gun?: It's a shame our fire-safety regulations aren't equally well admired.
    • Lashenden on Who supplied the gun?: Legally buying any firearm in the UK is very far from being 'scarily easy'. Despite much media misinformation, the misuse of legally held firearms by ...
    • Stu Bry on Sorry Not Sorry: Labour did not win this election but have a realistic path to a majority in the next one whenever that may be. They have also taken away the Tory majo...
    • kadinsky on Sorry Not Sorry: It's the strategies of his PLP critics that ought to be examined and questioned. If they hadn't monstered him for two years Labor would likely be in g...
    • woll on Sorry Not Sorry: A little self-righteous? Corbyn did better than expected but did not win or come near winning, against a very poor Tory campaign. In addition, in vari...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement