« | Home | »

Spare a thought for the armadillo

Tags: | | |

Sooner or later the Brazilian football team will be treated like lepers, or perceive themselves to be so. Unfair to lepers, but appropriate for an off-pitch reason. The official World Cup mascot, Fuleco, is a Brazilian three-banded armadillo. Humans apart, the armadillo is the only animal that gets leprosy. Admittedly, the evidence refers to the nine-banded kind; it is not known whether the three-banded armadillo is susceptible. It would be very hard to find out, because the Brazilian species is very rare and in danger of extinction. Fuleco’s name is a portmanteau of ‘Futebol’ and ‘Ecologia’.

Leprosy is still a big problem in Brazil; 33,000 new cases were diagnosed in 2012. Only India had more, with 134,752. It is yet another reason that makes it easy to understand why Brazilians are so unhappy about the vast sums that have been spent on a competition that has led to national humiliation.

And spare a thought for the armadillo. The nine-banded kind is doing far better in the US than the three-banded is in Brazil. It is spreading northwards, helped by giving birth each pregnancy to identical quadruplets, and by its ability to float across rivers by inflating its bowels. But in the US it has an uneven reputation. There was resistance in Texas to its nomination as the state small mammal. Leprosy occurs in it naturally and occasionally spreads from infected animals to humans. During the Great Depression (when newspapers were called ‘Hoover blankets’ because rough sleepers used them to keep warm), armadillos were known as ‘Hoover hogs’ when they were eaten by the poor in ironical fulfilment of Herbert Hoover’s promise of ‘a chicken in every pot’.

Comments

  1. Simon Wood says:

    In the old cantinas south of the Rio Grande, armadillos were derided by the pistoleros who used to pester the mines of the Sierra Madre, as the “pot-bellied chickens of the river”.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Camus on At the Luzhniki Stadium: Not often that I get the chance to tell this story. I was in Wembley Stadium on the day that England actually won the World Cup - not only that, I la...
    • Henri Kellogg on Four-Dimensional Proust: Heeding Mr Bernstein’s call for forward-moving (e.g., "Einstein's") time machines v. backwards-moving ones (e.g., Wells's), it might be worth callin...
    • Jeremy Bernstein on Four-Dimensional Proust: I thank my learned readers for the references to Welles and Lagrange. Welles's time machine can go backwards in time which relativity does not allow. ...
    • AndrewL on Four-Dimensional Proust: The conception of time as a fourth dimension goes back a bit further than Minkowski in 1907. Perhaps 150 years or 200 years earlier... Lagrange wr...
    • AnnaV on Four-Dimensional Proust: The first chapter of H. G. Wells's 'The Time Machine' (1895): 'There are really four dimensions, three which we call the three planes of Space, and...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement