« | Home | »

Meanwhile in Spain

Tags: | |

Outrage over Ukraine. Demonstrators blockade the government headquarters in protest against the government. The prime minster causes further offence by referring to the demonstrators as ‘Nazis and criminals’. The government then tries to close down protest using force. John Kerry expresses ‘disgust’.

Less outrage over Spain, where the conservative government is to introduce legislation to forbid, among other things, unauthorised demonstrations outside government headquarters. Organisers are to be punished with fines of up to €30,000 (eyewatering enough, though the original figure was €600,000). Dolores de Cospedal, the secretary of the ruling party, has used the term ‘Nazismo puro’ to refer to protesters.

The legislation is due to be passed next month, in time perhaps for protests against the privatisation of pensions, of which Olli Rehn will approve but which the Spanish electorate do not recall seeing in any manifesto. It also illegalises interference with evictions, which continue in their thousands.

In Ukraine, protest continues. In Spain, it is shortly to be silenced – not by chainsaws, but by fear of destitution.

Comments on “Meanwhile in Spain”

  1. farthington says:

    Quite.
    Putin the wolf in wolf’s clothing.
    And Europe? The wolf in the proverbial sheep’s clothing.
    Have the protestors informed themselves of the impasse at the heart of the EU?
    Enslavement for the periphery; enhancement of German hegemony.
    Total unaccountability from Brussels.
    If France has no hope under the current regime, what chance the Ukraine?
    Ukraine’s breadbasket there for the taking, and with the diabolical Monsanto frothing at the mouth for conquest, and like predators, courtesy of the totalitarian Trans-Atlantic Trade Treaty.

  2. foreign_correspondent says:

    The law that the Spanish government wants to pass to restrict unauthorised demonstrations outside government headquarters (the new legislation doesn’t apply to authorised demonstrations) shares some similarities with the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act that was passed in the UK in 2005 which aimed to “criminalise unauthorised demonstrations within an exclusion zone of one kilometre around Parliament Square” (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/2008/dec/16/serious-organised-crime-act).
    Although some modifications were later introduced to the SOCPA, I believe it’s still being debated both in Parliament and in court (http://www.repeal-socpa.info).

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • wearytruth on Stoke and Copeland: "Corbyn’s stated mission in leading Labour is to offer a break with the past and create an economy for the many, not the few." That was MY stated...
    • Ouessante on Stoke and Copeland: Stoke: Cons+UKIP 49.1%, Lab 37.1%. Saved only by a split vote. Hardly cause for Lab rejoicing I think. They should be very worried.
    • streetsj on Stoke and Copeland: As in all votes there are a multitude of reasons why people vote as they do but it seems unlikely that Nuttall's contribution was anything other than ...
    • piffin on Stoke and Copeland: That Labour could beat off Ukip's anti-immigrant challenge in Stoke but lose to the Tories in Copeland suggests the latter result was informed by the ...
    • suetonius on Remembering Seymour Papert: Oh my, flashback inducing. I remember being an undergraduate right when the book came out, physics student at the time. Several of my professors wer...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement