« | Home | »

Climate Change Vulnerability

Tags: |

Two weeks ago, Maplecroft published its sixth annual Climate Change Vulnerability Index. Maplecroft calls itself ‘the world’s leading global risk analytics, research and strategic forecasting company’; its ‘technological solutions identify emerging trends, business opportunities and risks to investments and supply chains worldwide’. The index didn’t get much media attention, though the Philippine Star reported that the Philippines ranks as the ninth most vulnerable country.

Maplecroft calculates the risk ‘by evaluating three factors’: ‘exposure to extreme climate-related events’, ‘the sensitivity of populations’ and countries’ ‘adaptive capacity’. There is a straightforward correlation between poverty and risk: richer countries are better prepared – they have more adaptive capacity and less sensitive populations. Supertyphoon Haiyan was one of the most powerful storms ever recorded, but that isn’t the only reason it was so deadly; if it had made landfall somewhere wealthier than Leyte and Samar, it would probably have killed fewer than 10,000 people. (Hurricane Katrina was less powerful than Sandy, but killed more than six times as many people.)

At the opening of the UN climate talks in Warsaw today, Yeb Saño, the Philippines’ chief negotiator, said he would ‘voluntarily refrain from eating food’ during the talks ‘until a meaningful outcome is in sight’. He was given a standing ovation. Delegates had tears in their eyes. But a ‘meaningful outcome’ is something else. Last week the World Meteorological Organisation announced that the ‘atmospheric increase of CO2 from 2011 to 2012 was higher than its average growth rate over the past ten years.’

Tropical Depression Zoraida is tonight heading towards the Philippines, bringing winds of up to 60 kph and up to 15 mm of rain.

Comments are closed.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Timothy Rogers on Fifa v. the FBI: What stake the US has in the ongoing tragicomedy of the FiFa World-Cup selection process is unclear. There is still no mass market for the sport in t...
    • Timothy Rogers on One Cubit the More: Yes, the talk (or essay) was a deliberative, thoughtful one. The cubit is used as a quantitative measure to indicate the amount of scientific knowled...
    • AndrewL on One Cubit the More: Thank you for the link, Timothy. I must admit, I had naively assumed it would be a "shoulders of giants" talk too, but it is so much better than that...
    • Timothy Rogers on One Cubit the More: Here is the link to the talk, which was published in the August 1963 issue of Encounter. It is really about intellectual modesty and clarity about ou...
    • AndrewL on One Cubit the More: In case anyone else is looking for the original Bible verse, as I was, I think it is Matthew 6:27: "Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit t...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement