« | Home | »

Ed’s Enemies

Tags: |

Ed Miliband’s enemies in the Labour Party are indulging in luxury: a pointless, expensive thing that only people with four years to spend can afford. Up to a point, they resemble John Major’s enemies in the Tory Party – a chorus of Viv Nicholsons who spent, spent, spent down to the penury of 165 surviving MPs in 1997. Those Tories had a reason, if an absurd one. They were hung up on the EU as a conspiracy by the heirs of Hitler to abolish England. The other motive for hating Major was devotion (in the High Church sense) to Margaret Thatcher, Queen and Martyr.

Ed’s enemies have no discernible principle, however misguided. They dream only of David: limp, charming US conformist, token foreign secretary, but the rightful heir to the shining void of Blairism. Childish beyond words, their view is supplemented by the trivialist press. Sketchwriters, too idle to stay for any parliamentary business except the leaders’ set piece, expatiate on voice timbre, assurance quotient, facial appearance and high-profile oneupmanship. The government meanwhile is rolling over in contradictions, policy reversals and ‘clarifications’. The opposition won’t need a ‘stronger’ leader to defeat them at the next election. They might try calm or reticence or even unity – or that bit in the Brer Rabbit books about lying low and saying nothing.

Comments

  1. Phil Edwards says:

    This was a joke, but I think it would actually work – if Miliband dropped off the radar until six months before the next election, then gave a press conference announcing that the Labour party (a) still existed and (b) had policies different from the Coalition, they’d probably get a majority. It would certainly be better than his current strategy, which seems to involve asking himself what Blair would say, thinking of something slightly left-wing and splitting the difference. As for the neo-Blairites (post-Blairites? crypto-Blairites?), a period of silence on their part would be most welcome.

    • ejh says:

      It’s roughly the policy that has been successfully pursued by the opposition in Spain for three years now. Say nothing, just not be the government.

  2. Attrition says:

    Liarbour doesn’t have different policies, it’s the third tory partei of the coalition.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Donald Smith on McMaster of War: At intelligence school at Fort Holabird an instructor put a film-strip on the screen showing a fella walking down the street seeing a sign asking: wh...
    • Camus on Another Housing Privatisation Disaster: There is a German offshoot called Deutsche Addington but I have not been interested enough to find out more until now. They have have been buying up p...
    • Charles Lambert on Fischia il vento: I live in Fondi, a smallish town halfway between Rome and Naples. Dickens called it the first Neapolitan town, which would place it safely in what Sal...
    • Rhotel41 on McMaster of War: Dave, you are learning about the depleted uranium penetrator, but still have it a bit wrong. The 120mm main gun rounds for the Abrams Tank are not ti...
    • Joe Morison on McMaster of War: I remember the 80s drama Threads which was about the what would happen if a bomb was dropped in Sheffield. It showed the effects at various distances...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement