« | Home | »

Ürümqi, Two Years On

Tags: | |

After the protests in Ürümqi on 5 July 2009, thousands of extra police and soldiers were brought into the city. On 7 July the authorities reported that almost 1500 people had been arrested for taking part in the demonstration, which they described as ‘a pre-empted, organised violent crime’. According to the authorities 184 people were killed, most of them Han Chinese. Both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International published eyewitness reports of official brutality during the ensuing crackdown, but there hasn’t been much corroborating evidence. Last week however a video appeared on YouTube that shows police and soldiers making arrests in Ürümqi. The clip appears to have been shot for state TV, since the reporter has permission to film.

The footage shows a succession of Uighur men being dragged into the street, handcuffed and made to lie face down. Their shirts are then pulled over their heads. At one point the soldiers enter a house and the cameraman isn’t allowed to follow. ‘It’s nothing,’ one of the officers says, just before a suspect is beaten and then the door is closed.

Most of the footage was taken in neighbourhoods with both Uighur and Han residents, which until the 2009 riots was common throughout Ürümqi (the population is two-thirds Han). The film shows bystanders hitting the arrested men with sticks or bats, and the police and soldiers doing little to stop them. When mobs of Han Chinese attacked Uighur neighbourhoods on 7 July in revenge for the killings two days earlier, the police and army similarly seemed to turn a blind eye (and even to arm the Han residents).

The film’s appearance just before the second anniversary of the riots may be part of an attempt to mobilise dissent, perhaps inspired by protests in other parts of China (not to mention the Middle East). The Chinese government is wary of such anniversaries. It seems likely that troops will return to the streets of Ürümqi in large numbers in the coming weeks.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • wearytruth on Stoke and Copeland: "Corbyn’s stated mission in leading Labour is to offer a break with the past and create an economy for the many, not the few." That was MY stated...
    • Ouessante on Stoke and Copeland: Stoke: Cons+UKIP 49.1%, Lab 37.1%. Saved only by a split vote. Hardly cause for Lab rejoicing I think. They should be very worried.
    • streetsj on Stoke and Copeland: As in all votes there are a multitude of reasons why people vote as they do but it seems unlikely that Nuttall's contribution was anything other than ...
    • piffin on Stoke and Copeland: That Labour could beat off Ukip's anti-immigrant challenge in Stoke but lose to the Tories in Copeland suggests the latter result was informed by the ...
    • suetonius on Remembering Seymour Papert: Oh my, flashback inducing. I remember being an undergraduate right when the book came out, physics student at the time. Several of my professors wer...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement