« | Home | »

The Nardac’s Wife

Tags: |

Royal occasions offer the pleasure of mass atavism, including the revival of antediluvian words and attitudes. As journalists and newsreaders constantly drool, Catherine Middleton is a ‘commoner’. When her wedding was announced, the word turned up in the Mail and the Telegraph, even – though in bet-hedging scare quotes – in the ‘liberal’ Guardian. The overseas press has been at it too. The other day, France 24 told its viewers that the prince was to wed a roturier; the Corriere della Sera said that he was marrying a borghese. It reopens neighbouring semantic fields, notably the use of ‘common’ to mean ‘not distinguished’, ‘vulgar, of plebeian origin, nature (derog.)’, as in ‘a common prostitute’, ‘common as muck’ and so on.

Perhaps journalists with copy to file on this vacuous topic only pretend to take seriously the idea that humans, like racehorses, can be sorted into thoroughbreds and also-rans. But it seems to be held in earnest by the Prince of Wales, who notoriously put his unflappable reaction down to ‘a thousand years of breeding’ when a prankster let off a starting-pistol near him during a visit to Australia in 1994. No doubt when on marriage the queen makes her fiancé Nardac of Gunderland, Ms Middleton will be able to leave her vulgar origins behind. Until then, in fact, Prince William counts as a commoner too, as he’s neither yet the sovereign nor a peer of the realm. But then if we go back a bit, we’re all the offspring of apes, some no doubt commoner than others.

Comments on “The Nardac’s Wife”

  1. alex says:

    Are professors commoners?

  2. Joe Morison says:

    The OED‘s most relevant definition of ‘commoner’ is “2.a More generally: One of the common people; a member of the commonalty. (Now applied to all below the rank of a peer.)”. Is this really true of HRH Prince William? What is the ranking between peers and the monarch and the rest of us? If Mr. Newey is in possession of this esoteric knowledge, he must share it.

    If this sounds mad, you should try living in the middle of it. I walked past Buck Palace today, i have only ever seen so many film crews together on film – everywhere there were cameras and people commenting and interviewing, there’s a new triple height studio block that overlooks the palace and fronts an intensely compacted compound of the world’s media that is the size of a small village and has a hundred massive satellite dishes; hyperreality in action.

  3. Bob Beck says:

    Speaking of common, or rather uncommon, it’s a pity Googlewhacking seems to be over. (Isn’t it? The home page thereof hasn’t been updated in years). Google “nardac” and “gunderland” (without quotes, of course), and this page is the only one you’ll find.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andrewjmc on Why did Labour MPs vote with the government?: With reference to the support of working class Labour supporters in Brexity areas: Professor John Curtice, who's generally believed to know a thing or...
    • alpan on When Yes Means No: Ayşe Zarakol is generally on point, though I'm not sure what is gained by labeling the whole event a "foregone conclusion." Buna ne gerek vardı ger...
    • andrewjmc on May’s Gambit: @semitone: Professor John Curtice doesn't think you're right about Labour voters in Leave constituencies voting 'Leave'. He thinks it may be a politic...
    • Nick on May’s Gambit: There is also the timing of the Brexit negotiations themselves. Those around the Cabinet table may have started out by believing their own rhetoric, ...
    • deano on The Usual Rhetoric: US itself has never been shy of using chemical weapons, even nukes in SE Asia, Japan, etc. Justification being it helped to *save* lives..

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement