« | Home | »

Jolly Bootstraps

Tags: |

Yvette Cooper said at the weekend that criticism of her decision not to stand for the Labour leadership was unfeminist. I didn’t entirely follow her reasoning, but then I also don’t understand why having small children should be a reason for Cooper to hold back but not for her husband, Ed Balls. No such qualms would restrain Louise Bagshawe, heavy metal fan, chick-lit author, ardent Catholic, divorcée, millionaire, mother of three and the new Conservative member for Corby and East Northamptonshire. ‘I was quite annoyed that Margaret Thatcher was prime minister,’ Bagshawe has said, ‘because that meant I couldn’t be the first woman prime minister.’

She’s never been one to hang about. Her first novel, Career Girls, came out in 1995, when she was 22. She freely admits that her books ‘obviously… have no redeeming literary merit at all’, and there isn’t enough sex for them to count as bonkbusters. But there’s no shortage of camp lines like ‘Her name was Lola Montoya and God, she was a cold bitch,’ lots of descriptions of what people are wearing, and love-across-the-classes storylines: Will is the Hertford College rugby hunk who’s made it to Oxford despite being brought up by Barnardo’s, Melissa is a don’s daughter tactfully choosing fish and chips from the pub menu (this is Passion: the others are called Glitz, Glamour and, most recently, Desire). The attention to the practicalities of money – Will and Melissa go on picnics and Will has had to save up for fillet steak for her birthday – is quaint in a genre that has traditionally paid no attention to that sort of thing; in another of her books the three heroines’ trust fund is taken away from them and they have to go out and earn a living. In their girl powery way, they like it better.

Enthusiasm is Bagshawe’s topnote. ‘Of course women can have it all – if they want it all – I won’t hear any defeatist talk! If you just dwell on problems, you won’t get anywhere fast.’ The foil to her headmistressy, jolly bootstraps stridency isn’t just a lack of attention to detail – she once described a character in one of her novels as wearing a pair of white leather trousers designed by campaigning vegetarian Stella McCartney – it is also a Blair Babe-style arch-loyalism. Her political website (a product of Ashcroft money) emphasises growth, change and social action, or litter-picking; Bagshawe ‘believes in the growth agenda for Corby’ and cheers despondent Conservatives on from her regular blogs for conservativehome. In late March, she puppyishly wrote: ‘We’re going to win this election. And I can’t wait.’ She greeted her majority of 1951 votes at 3.45 a.m. on election night – by which time a hung parliament was already looking inevitable – with an acceptance speech littered with references to ‘change’ and calling David Cameron ‘our prime minister’. Cameron himself, cooing over babies in a maternity ward and conspicuously loading the dishwasher on his webcam, called Samantha Cameron his ‘secret weapon’, and on election night she, dressed in deep blue like a pregnant Virgin Mary, showed the world how he seems to like his women: pretty, docile, reserved, occasionally giggly but mostly silent.

Comments

  1. pinhut says:

    This is like those Private Eye prizes for finding plugs for Sky TV masquerading as new stories in Murdoch rags.

    Isn’t it?

  2. pinhut says:

    Because it appeared to be about a woman running for Labour leader, and then not, Yvette Cooper, before becoming an extended profile of another woman, Louise Bagshawe, who did not run for Labour leader, and indeed, as a Tory, was not eligible to do so. The impression thus given is of the pre-existing need to write about Louise Bagshawe resulting in a search for a suitable means of shoehorning her into a blog post, hence the Murdoch/Sky TV reference.

  3. pinhut says:

    I’m not against it, I’m all for finding more extraneous mentions of Bagshawe in the LRB.

  4. Phil Gyford says:

    Bagshawe … cheers despondent Conservatives on from her regular blogs for conservativehome.

    I assume these are actually “blog posts” on the conservativehome blog, and Bagshawe doesn’t maintain several separate “blogs” on that site?


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Timothy Rogers on Russiagate Revisited: While I get Lears’ skepticism about the public (and/or press) reception of the Mueller investigation’s indictments, I don’t get his resistance t...
    • Coldish on Why We Strike: My capacity for sympathy with the concerns of the university staff is tempered by the fact that even after more than 25 years continuous direct part-t...
    • mildly_baffled on Why We Strike: Seems like the financial realities that have raped private sector pension provision in the last decade, are finally catching up with academia - using ...
    • Waseem Yaqoob on Why We Strike: The final salary scheme for university staff was closed in 2011. The USS pension scheme is not funded out of general taxation; it is not a public sect...
    • bidem on Why We Strike: Final salary pension schemes have almost disappeared in the private sector. Basically because they are too expensive. It is inevitable that similar p...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement