« | Home | »

Last Gang in Town

Tags: |

Keane (the band) aren’t happy about the Tories using their song ‘Everybody’s Changing’. Quite right too. Though I wonder who at Conservative central office chose it as the party’s theme song, and what their ulterior motives may have been, since it doesn’t exactly endorse Cameron’s post-Obama message of change. ‘Everybody’s changing and I don’t know why,’ the first chorus goes. Later: ‘Everybody’s changing and I don’t feel right.’ Is the Tories’ co-option of the song perhaps a subtle attempt to reassure more conservative party members that it’s OK not to be comfortable with the whole ‘change’ thing? Or is it a sly attempt by a disgruntled old guard to undermine Cameron? Then again, maybe it’s just another facet of the deep confusion underlying the paradoxical slogan ‘Vote for Change. Vote Conservative.’ Plus ça change…

Leaving aside such knotty political conundrums, the really important question is what song the Tories should be using instead. I would suggest, off the top of my head, ‘The Upper Classes’ by the Auteurs (‘There’s nothing wrong with inherited wealth/if you melt the silver yourself’), Blur’s ‘Charmless Man’ (‘educated the expensive way…’) or possibly ‘Last Gang in Town’ by the Clash. Then again, both in acknowledgment of the general direness of the state of the nation and to appeal to rural voters, how about Iron Maiden’s ‘Run to the Hills’?

Comments on “Last Gang in Town”

  1. loxhore says:

    I have to say that that slogan is not in fact confusing. To conserve may have to be to restore, and change back is change enough.

  2. Chris Larkin says:

    If Mr Cameron wanted to convince the electorate of just how far he was prepared to go to fix our so called broken society then perhaps ‘Eton Rifles’ by The Jam would have been a more fitting choice.

  3. A.J.P. Crown says:

    If they’re serious about change, they couldn’t do better than Money Is The Root Of All Evil, by N.A.S.A.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • wearytruth on Stoke and Copeland: "Corbyn’s stated mission in leading Labour is to offer a break with the past and create an economy for the many, not the few." That was MY stated...
    • Ouessante on Stoke and Copeland: Stoke: Cons+UKIP 49.1%, Lab 37.1%. Saved only by a split vote. Hardly cause for Lab rejoicing I think. They should be very worried.
    • streetsj on Stoke and Copeland: As in all votes there are a multitude of reasons why people vote as they do but it seems unlikely that Nuttall's contribution was anything other than ...
    • piffin on Stoke and Copeland: That Labour could beat off Ukip's anti-immigrant challenge in Stoke but lose to the Tories in Copeland suggests the latter result was informed by the ...
    • suetonius on Remembering Seymour Papert: Oh my, flashback inducing. I remember being an undergraduate right when the book came out, physics student at the time. Several of my professors wer...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement