Skip navigation
London Review of Books London Review Bookshop

Search the LRB

All the words
Exact phrase

advanced search

SUBSCRIBER REGISTRATION

Subscribers to the LRB currently get free access to the full content of the magazine in an online edition. If you are a subscriber and would like to register for online access click here

If you are already registered you can log in from our login page

If you would like further information about subscribing to the LRB click here.

London Review Bookshop

Call Her Daisy-Ray subscriber-only content

John Sturrock

  • Talking Proper: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol by Lynda Mugglestone

In his 1957 classic of demystification, Mythologies, Roland Barthes found a new argument with which to reopen the troublesome case of Gaston Dominici. Dominici was a septuagenarian Provençal farmer who in 1954 was tried for the murder of three members of an English family who had been camping close to his land. He was found guilty and sentenced to death, but the sentence was later reduced to life imprisonment and he was eventually let out after doing only six years, his guilt having come to look less and less sure. (The case still hasn’t expired: there are dozens of Dominici websites on the Internet, some of them coming out for and some against him.) In his brilliantly tendentious commentary, Barthes suggests that the illiterate farmer was condemned in part because he didn’t speak the same language as the authorities who tried him. Or rather, he spoke the same language in name only, French, ‘the clearest there is’, as Barthes sardonically notes; but the sub-Alpine patois in which Dominici, his family and his neighbours can be imagined giving their statements would have been less than consistently transparent to the lawyers and judges conducting the trial. Because he was a French citizen, however, there was no question of him being allowed an interpreter, since that would give the lie to the principle that French is a single language covering the whole nation, any one speaker of which is to be assumed capable of following what any other speaker is saying. This assumption was, for Barthes, a ‘myth’ that might in such a serious instance have proved fatal, with the perhaps innocent Dominici being condemned out of his own mouth, not for what he did say but for what he couldn’t.

subscriber-only content Subscribers to the print edition can log in to view the entire article. For information about subscribing to the London Review of Books click here. This article is available for purchase online. Buy this article.

John Sturrock is consulting editor at the London Review.

LRB cover artwork

From the archive

Short Cuts
Andrew O’Hagan: Slayer Slang and Bling Bling