Skip navigation
London Review of Books London Review Bookshop

Search the LRB

All the words
Exact phrase

advanced search

SUBSCRIBER REGISTRATION

Subscribers to the LRB currently get free access to the full content of the magazine in an online edition. If you are a subscriber and would like to register for online access click here

If you are already registered you can log in from our login page

If you would like further information about subscribing to the LRB click here.

London Review Bookshop

It had better be big subscriber-only content

Daniel Soar

  • Notable American Women by Ben Marcus
  • Assorted Fire Events by David Means

In an exam I once took we were presented with a passage that began: ‘To see the wind, with a man his eyes, it is impossible, the nature of it is so fine.’ I found that sentence so distractingly meaningless, and lovely, that it was hard to concentrate on the rest of the passage, which (much more comprehensibly) described a snowy field over which a light wind was blowing; tiny particles of snow were picked up by the wind and carried short distances in complicated patterns, so that the way the wind blew was suddenly visible, in the same way that dye in water makes visible the flow of hidden currents. Part of the test was, supposedly, to determine when the passage would have been written, and by whom, to contextualise it without external clues. Was this deliberately distorted language, newly written? I had no idea; mesmerised by that sentence, I panicked. Years later, I discovered that the source was Roger Ascham’s Toxophilus (1545), ostensibly a book about the pleasures of archery. Ascham was a schoolmaster. His mission, he felt, was to make writing accessible for an audience that knew little Latin but longed to be educated. Now that everything is available on the Internet, the passage appears online in multiple past papers on university websites from Florida to Michigan. In order to test the ability of the must-be-educated to find the context, examiners clearly study other exam papers and transplant words from one contextless context into another, copying also the (deliberately?) misleading modernised spelling that makes you read the words the wrong way. The passage’s original purpose – to be understood – seems to be lost on those setting the tests. But perhaps it had lost its context in any case: as a record of a moment during a walk from one parish to the next, it seems to belong to a class of Romantic epiphanies; there is nothing like it in the writing of its own time. It should have been less Wordsworthian; it’s unclassifiable.

subscriber-only content Subscribers to the print edition can log in to view the entire article. For information about subscribing to the London Review of Books click here. This article is available for purchase online. Buy this article.

Daniel Soar is an editor at the London Review.

LRB cover artwork

From the archive

Belgravia Cockney
Christopher Tayler on being a le Carré bore

Post-Paranoid
Michael Wood on Underworld by Don Delillo

Remember me
Adam Phillips on Bret Easton Ellis

Check out the parking lot
Rebecca Solnit: Hell in LA

Immortally Cute
Rebecca Mead: Alice Sebold