
Danny Karlin, who teaches English at University College London, is the author of Browning’s Hatreds.
MORE BY THIS CONTRIBUTOR
RELATED ARTICLES
25 May 1995
Arctic Habits
28 January 1993
Manly Love
23 October 2003
Lincoln
25 May 1995
Anti-Slavery Begins at Home
6 October 2005
The ambition of William Dean Howells
16 November 2000
On Fitz-Greene Halleck
4 June 1998
On Walt Whitman
RELATED CATEGORIES
Dickinson, Emily, Literature and literary criticism, Poetry, Americas, North America, USA, Biography and memoirs, Biography, 1800-1899, 1840-1859, 1800-1899, 1860-1879
Vol. 22 No. 16 · 24 August 2000
pages 21-22 | 3334 words

Recurring Women
Danny Karlin
- The Poems of Emily Dickinson: Variorum Edition edited by R.W. Franklin
Harvard, 1654 pp, £83.50, October 1998, ISBN 0 674 67622 X
- The Poems of Emily Dickinson: Reading Edition edited by R.W. Franklin
Harvard, 692 pp, £19.95, September 1999, ISBN 0 674 67624 6
- Emily Dickinson: Monarch of Perception by Domhnall Mitchell
Massachusetts, 352 pp, £31.95, March 2000, ISBN 1 55849 226 7
Publication – is the Auction
Of the Mind of Man –
(#788)
Editing Emily Dickinson’s poetry is a problem which continues to vex literary scholars and textual critics; meanwhile the publication, or dissemination, of Dickinson goes on apace. A trivial instance: the giant puppet of the ‘Belle of Amherst’, dressed in that distinctive ghost-white dress, which features in the movie Being John Malkovich. A hitherto ‘unknown’ photograph of Dickinson recently advertised on E-Bay, the Internet auction site. Shady dealings in allegedly ‘new’ poems by Dickinson – discovered, authenticated, sold and discredited. I recently received a flyer advertising Edie Campbell’s one-woman show at the Edinburgh Fringe, in which the actress ‘wants to be Emily’s mouthpiece’: My Life Has Stood: The Journey of a Portrayal unfolds with Campbell onstage, sewing the dress in which she is to portray Dickinson, while ‘delving into the very fibre of her poems and letters’. Dickinson’s murmur has been sent over the roofs of the world, just as emphatically as Whitman’s barbaric yawp. But not by her. Even Coriolanus was forced to stand in the street and show his wounds; but Dickinson was a greater despiser of the people.
You are not Logged In
- If you have already registered login here
- If you are a print subscriber using the site for the first time please register here
- If you are not yet a subscriber you can subscribe here
- If you are a member of a subscribing institution or University library please login here
- If you have an Institutional print subscription and online access is not included, find out about our Institutional online subscriptions
This article is also available for purchase from the London Review Bookshop. Contact us for rights and issues enquiries.
print this article
Letters
Vol. 22 No. 19 · 5 October 2000
From Martha Nell Smith
Daniel Karlin (LRB, 24 August) makes it sound as if the members of the Dickinson Editing Collective are opposed to R.W. Franklin's edition of Emily Dickinson's poetry. Though we may disagree with some of Franklin's decisions, and though our philosophy of scholarly editing and adhering to the highest standards possible may differ from Franklin's, we are not his opponents. Rather, we are offering different and complementary editorial praxes that make more elements of Dickinson's manuscripts visible than do Franklin's new variorum and reading editions of her poems. Indeed, had he bothered to read our work rather than rely on Domhnall Mitchell's selective quotations, Karlin might have realised that we do not presume to be recovering Emily Dickinson's intentions nor offering a purer understanding of them. Though Mitchell's may be, our critical understanding of authorial intentions is not so simplistic that we assume we can know and recover Dickinson's.
Martha Nell Smith
Dickinson Electronic Archives Projects<br />University of Maryland
Vol. 22 No. 22 · 16 November 2000
From D.A. Reichardt
I was teaching Dickinson last month, and after reading Martha Nell Smith's letter on the Dickinson Electronic Archives (5 October), I rushed to examine its 'different and complementary editorial praxes', but failed to find a way in or even to gain any idea of the criteria for access. An e-mail to the collective remains unanswered. Unless someone can enlighten me I shall have to continue to rely on the reassuring solidity of R.W. Franklin's editions.
D.A. Reichardt
James Cook University<br />Cairns, Queensland
Vol. 23 No. 1 · 4 January 2001
From Martha Nell Smith
It was with some dismay that I read D.A. Reichardt's letter (16 November 2000) claiming that she had 'failed to find a way in' to the Dickinson Electronic Archives and that 'an e-mail to the collective remains unanswered.' I cannot say when her request for access was first forwarded to us, but I can say that I answered her on 12 November. We are eager to get as much feedback as possible: if you do not hear from us within a couple of days, please contact us again.
Martha Nell Smith
Dickinson Electronic Archives Projects, University of Maryland