<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="0.91">
	<channel>
		<title>London Review of Books </title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/</link>
		<description>Literary review publishing essay-length book reviews and topical articles on politics, literature, history, philosophy, science and the arts by leading writers and thinkers</description>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		<copyright>LRB (London) Ltd.</copyright>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<ttl>20160</ttl>
		<webMaster>ben@lrb.co.uk (Ben Campbell)</webMaster>
		<managingEditor>registrar@lrb.co.uk (Ben Campbell)</managingEditor>
		
		<item>
			<title>Michael Wood: Barthes</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/michael-wood/presence-of-mind</link>
			<description>It’s easy, and usually rash, to use the word ‘unforgettable’, or even ‘memorable’, since we can forget anything. But then what we hang on to becomes all the more remarkable, and Barthes, like Cole Porter, was the author of phrases and rhythms that for some of us will not go away until we do.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>John Gray: Keynes</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/john-gray/we-simply-do-not-know</link>
			<description>To suggest that the source of market volatility is unreason is to imply that if people were fully rational markets could be stable. But even if people were affectless calculating machines they would still be ignorant of the future, and markets would still be volatile. The root cause of market instability is the insuperable limitation of human knowledge.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bernard Porter: MI5</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/bernard-porter/other-peoples-mail</link>
			<description>As well as being relaxed about reading other people’s letters, these people seem – from the examples quoted here – to have been racist, anti-semitic, sexist and homophobic (ostensibly) to a degree unusual even for their time, though perhaps not for their class. They also tended to be cheery and fond of outdoor sports.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Slavoj Žižek: Neo-Anti-Communism</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/slavoj-zizek/post-wall</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tariq Ali: Af-Pak</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/tariq-ali/short-cuts</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hal Foster: Ed Ruscha</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/hal-foster/at-the-hayward</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jacob Empson, R.W. Johnson, Gabriel Laszlo, Ernesto Priego, Inigo Thomas, Charlie Hill, Thomas Jones, Renee Slater</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22//letters</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Letters</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/letters</link>
			<category>Correspondence</category>
			<description>The letters page from London Review of Books Volume 31 issue 22</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Table of contents</title>
			<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n22/contents</link>
			<category>Table of contents</category>
			<description>Table of contents from London Review of Books Volume 31 issue 22</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
