<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LRB blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>The Blog of the London Review of Books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Freejoyce! by nickmimic</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2012/02/10/jon-day/freejoyce/comment-page-1/#comment-5285</link>
		<dc:creator>nickmimic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=11065#comment-5285</guid>
		<description>Sic: 2nd line should read &quot;2039&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sic: 2nd line should read &#8220;2039&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Ayacucho by Belén Fernández</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2012/02/09/belen-fernandez/in-ayacucho/comment-page-1/#comment-5284</link>
		<dc:creator>Belén Fernández</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=11060#comment-5284</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;ve written anything on your time there please send along; I&#039;d love to read it!

The policemen I spoke with in Ayacucho--who had battled both Sendero and the MRTA in the Alto Huallaga in the 1980s--said that the former were more &quot;sanguinario&quot;, but I didn&#039;t encounter any sympathy for either movement among ex-soldiers or police. Which area were your soldiers from?

The ex-soldiers I spoke with additionally approved of the extrajudicial execution of MRTA members at the end of the Japanese hostage crisis under Fujimori.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve written anything on your time there please send along; I&#8217;d love to read it!</p>
<p>The policemen I spoke with in Ayacucho&#8211;who had battled both Sendero and the MRTA in the Alto Huallaga in the 1980s&#8211;said that the former were more &#8220;sanguinario&#8221;, but I didn&#8217;t encounter any sympathy for either movement among ex-soldiers or police. Which area were your soldiers from?</p>
<p>The ex-soldiers I spoke with additionally approved of the extrajudicial execution of MRTA members at the end of the Japanese hostage crisis under Fujimori.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Freejoyce! by nickmimic</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2012/02/10/jon-day/freejoyce/comment-page-1/#comment-5283</link>
		<dc:creator>nickmimic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=11065#comment-5283</guid>
		<description>We should remember that as Ireland is no longer part of the U.K. (!), they do not abide by U.K. copyright law (i.e. unpublished manuscripts in copyright till 1939).

Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of 2000, it appears that unpublished material is not in the public domain because of a section that implies works unpublished at author&#039;s death are copyrighted for 50 years from the date of publication. Thus, until those works are published (with permission from the Estate, i.e. not &quot;Cats in Copenhagen&quot;), they enjoy perpetual copyright. However, this vague language will most likely take a court case or two to clarify (language that the U.K. cleared up in its 1988 act).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should remember that as Ireland is no longer part of the U.K. (!), they do not abide by U.K. copyright law (i.e. unpublished manuscripts in copyright till 1939).</p>
<p>Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of 2000, it appears that unpublished material is not in the public domain because of a section that implies works unpublished at author&#8217;s death are copyrighted for 50 years from the date of publication. Thus, until those works are published (with permission from the Estate, i.e. not &#8220;Cats in Copenhagen&#8221;), they enjoy perpetual copyright. However, this vague language will most likely take a court case or two to clarify (language that the U.K. cleared up in its 1988 act).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Going Slow by SNissan</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2012/02/07/julian-sayarer/going-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator>SNissan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=11037#comment-5282</guid>
		<description>Apologies - didn&#039;t mean to provide the above link by tagging a specific comment. 

Should&#039;ve been http://www.lfgss.com/thread79432.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies &#8211; didn&#8217;t mean to provide the above link by tagging a specific comment. </p>
<p>Should&#8217;ve been <a href="http://www.lfgss.com/thread79432.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lfgss.com/thread79432.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Going Slow by SNissan</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2012/02/07/julian-sayarer/going-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-5281</link>
		<dc:creator>SNissan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=11037#comment-5281</guid>
		<description>I am also glad of the campaign, but don&#039;t entirely agree with its focus nor its tone. 

A good disucssion of some of London&#039;s most experienced cyclists&#039; views can be found here on the London Fixed Gear and Single Speed Forum&#039;s thread on the subject. http://www.lfgss.com/thread79432-9.html#post2685801

Many express their discontent (qualified usually with gratitude for the exposure) with a campaign that is focusing on a supposed inherent riskiness to cycling, thereby obscuring the responsibility not only of BoJo and his policies, but above all of drivers.
This maybe reflects the desire of many of london&#039;s riders to see more people, and less vehicles, on the streets and I tend to agree with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also glad of the campaign, but don&#8217;t entirely agree with its focus nor its tone. </p>
<p>A good disucssion of some of London&#8217;s most experienced cyclists&#8217; views can be found here on the London Fixed Gear and Single Speed Forum&#8217;s thread on the subject. <a href="http://www.lfgss.com/thread79432-9.html#post2685801" rel="nofollow">http://www.lfgss.com/thread79432-9.html#post2685801</a></p>
<p>Many express their discontent (qualified usually with gratitude for the exposure) with a campaign that is focusing on a supposed inherent riskiness to cycling, thereby obscuring the responsibility not only of BoJo and his policies, but above all of drivers.<br />
This maybe reflects the desire of many of london&#8217;s riders to see more people, and less vehicles, on the streets and I tend to agree with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 11/28 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.lrb.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 17:56:16 -->
