« | Home | »

Trump and the Doomsday Machine

Tags: |

This is not an abstraction

This is not an abstraction

At the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis, Stanley Kubrick was living in England. He decided that it was not safe there and he should move his family to Australia. Since he refused to fly commercially, he booked passage on a boat. But when he found that he would have to share the bathroom facilities with a neighbouring cabin he cancelled the whole thing, preferring to take his chances with the bomb.

He had studied the RAND Corporation’s game theory analyses of nuclear deterrence, and read Herman Kahn, who thought the planet could survive a few megadeaths. He came to the conclusion that all of this was delusional. Every strategy led to paradox and none could anticipate reality. This is what inspired him to make Dr Strangelove.

The film came out in 1964, when there was still above ground nuclear testing. The last such test was by the Chinese in 1980. That nobody does them any more is a good thing, given the dangers of fallout, but it has had the effect of turning nuclear weapons into something of an abstraction. I come from a generation of schoolchildren who were taught to hide under our desks in case of a nuclear raid. I sometimes wish there could be a demonstration test of a hydrogen bomb. I saw two nuclear bomb tests in the Nevada desert in 1957, and it is a sight you never forget. Observing such a test might be of special value to Donald Trump, whose comments on nuclear weapons have become more and more inane and more and more dangerous.

‘Let it be an arms race,’ the president elect said on MSNBC before Christmas. ‘We will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all.’ What can this possibly mean? Who are ‘they’ and how will we outmatch ‘them’? Is this a contest to build more and bigger and bigger bombs? Is it some sort of endurance race in which we will ‘outlast them all’? In these matters President Putin sounds more rational than Trump. He has said his goal is to modernise Russia’s nuclear weapons and limit the cost. A case can be made for modernising America’s weapons too. This would cost a trillion dollars or so.

Who knows what Trump’s plan – if there is a plan – will cost? What does he plan to do about North Korea, which seems to be approaching full nuclear status? This is especially acute if he continues to alienate the Chinese, who might be able to put a brake on the Korean programme. He is like someone in a bumper car at a fairground, lurching from place to place, babbling incoherently. Even Stanley Kubrick could not have invented Donald Trump and even Australia may not be safe.

Comments on “Trump and the Doomsday Machine”

  1. SamGamgee says:

    I’m not being snarky. But “Every strategy led to paradox” (not “lead”) and “the dangers of fallout” (not “fall out”).

    An admirable post. Maybe eds can correct silently.

  2. Stu Bry says:

    It’s a strange article on nuclear weapons which doesn’t mention the USA’s Star Wars program and Obama’s recent attempts to create a viable missile shield.

  3. I got a B- in Freshman English at Harvard.

    • mjr04guard-orders@yahoo.com says:

      I work as a professional copy-editor.
      “Led” is the correct spelling of the past tense of the verb “lead” and “fallout” is the correct spelling of the noun in the New Oxford Spelling Dictionary (OUP). “Sam Gamgee” is evidently completely GeeGam. Your English is A+.

      I spent the morning of 9 November after the election researching fallout shelters and the effects of an 8-megaton warhead detonating on or over the German air force base at Lager Lechfeld south of Augsburg where I live. Clearly even if we survived the first blast effects in the cellar (a cell with 40 cm of concrete on all sides) we would be buried under metre-high contaminated rubble and would be in the position of those people described in Revelation chapter 9 verse 6.

  4. Graucho says:

    Given Mr. T’s pronouncements on various defence issues and Russia and NATO, maybe the best use of our nuclear deterent is to point the trident missiles at the White House and let him know that if he allows Putin to walk into Western Europe he’s next.

  5. streetsj says:

    Ironically Trump’s irrational unpredictability improves the deterrent effect of nuclear weapons. Putin has successfully anticipated that the West would do nothing to stop him intervening in the Ukraine and Syria. Would he be so confident with Trump in the White House?
    [This argument, unattractive as it is, assumes that Trump isn’t owned by Putin]

    • John Cowan says:

      Perhaps. In the nuclear age there have been three military strategies: strong-and-sane, like the U.S. and the Soviet Union (evil does not mean insane); weak-and-sane, like Western European countries; and weak-and-crazy, like North Korea. Nobody knows what strong-and-crazy looks like.

      • zbs says:

        There’s something about the “madman theory”–the theory part, I guess–that carries the suggestion that it was a cunning, finely-reasoned, daring kind of insanity. Or rather a kind of super-sanity, which condescends to mute incomprehension, such as might accompany the photo illustration for this post.

  6. IPFreely says:

    So what about a remake of Dr. Strangelove before reality closes in on us?
    For a very good summary of the nuclear arms race viewed from the American angle, take a look at “The Atomic Café’ which is available on You Tube.

    • Let me endorse “The Atomic Cafe’. The test that is described was one of the ones I saw in 1957 in which soldiers were marched the “ground zero” and some got sick.
      About a year ago Trump gave an on record interview to two reporters in the New York Times about nuclear weapons. I wrote a long blog that you can find on the New York Review of books website. There is a link to the interview. It shows Trump’s ignorance of the subject. He is against proliferation but Japan and South Korea should have them to save us money. The Iran treaty is bad because Iran bought planes from Airbus and not Boeing.When it was pointed out to him that it was against the law for Boeing to sell to Iran Trump said “Huh?” I thought at the time that there was no chance that the American people would let this “short-fingered vulgarian” anywhere near the nuclear codes. I was wrong evidently. But I do not see any evidence that he has learned anything. When he was asked about North Korea’s missiles he said “It won’t happen.” Yes?
      Things were stable for decades precisely because they were predictable. That is what Mutually Assured Destruction is.Is there anyone in that group he has selected who can keep him in check?

  7. IPFreely says:

    The ladies in hats interviewed in “Atomic Café’ were all proto-Trump supporters. While you’re at it, take a look at “Hearts and Minds” to see how predominantly democratic administrations went about foreign policy during the fifties and sixties. Is it possible that Trump will do it worse than Kennedy and Johnson?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Delaide on Inauguration Day: I know it's not cool to praise Obama, or HRC for that matter. But in the context of what's possible in American politics, I think he did a remarkable ...
    • trumpaverse on The Nightmare Begins: It's not an incipient nightmare anymore: it has arrived. I did much searching this sad evening to locate something online to help me deal with my an...
    • suetonius on He won, won, won: You know what's funny? In Trump's description of the Twilight Zone episode, the guy dies in an accident. Actually, he's shot by the police. I find ...
    • melsumar on At the Gogol Centre: Several years ago I took a group of sixth formers to The Tempest in Russian. It turned out to be brilliant, especially for making them realise the phy...
    • Graucho on Inauguration Day: In a just world the Iran Contra affair would have had Reagan impeached and imprisoned, but it isn't a just world.

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement