« | Home | »

How long a runway?

Tags:

Assuming the pilots of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 didn’t destroy the plane; assuming they didn’t crash-land it either; and assuming instead they got it to an airfield, how long would the runway have to be to accommodate a jet as large as a Boeing 777?

According to the plane’s manufacturers, anywhere between 1200 and 2500 metres. The variable factors are: the altitude of the runway (the higher it is, the longer it has to be); the weight of the plane; and the weather. A 777 at its maximum landing weight arriving in the rain at high altitude requires twice the distance to land as an unladen 777 landing at sea level on a dry runway.

Vast as the search area for MH370 may be, there aren’t thousands of airfields with runways at least 1100 meters long. So you’d think the places to look could be narrowed down.

And yet. Boeing 777s have such excellent crash-landing records. It is the safest commercial airliner ever built. The British Airways flight from Beijing to Heathrow that crash-landed in 2008 came to a halt in no distance at all. The plane touched down before reaching the tarmac, the undercarriage and one of the engines were ripped away, fuel leaked from the plane but didn’t ignite. The co-pilot, John Coward, who brought the plane down safely, was said to be a hero.

In other words, if MH370 didn’t disappear into the ocean, and was landed by whoever was in control of it, then the area to search remains absolutely vast. Several hundred metres of flat grassland might be all that was needed to bring it to a stop.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement