« | Home | »

IF: This University Is Free


Three years ago I wrote a blog post hailing the New College for the Humanities as a parodically bad response to the ongoing marketisation of UK higher education, which prompted me to quit the system at that time. The NCH offers tuition at £18,000, and presumably more for its overseas intake (the college keeps its foreign students’ rates secret). That’s double the rate that was then being introduced as the sector norm in public universities, for which the jeunesse dorée get to camp in Bloomsbury, drawn by the roster of telly dons that the college had on board, at least for publicity purposes.

At the end of the post, without much hope that it would happen, I sketched an alternative to the NCH:

Found a national humanities and social sciences college whose intake, while based on academic merit, is confined to state-school pupils, with a bias towards those from non-academic backgrounds, sought through an active outreach programme… Charge no up-front or deferred fees. Rather than dangling a fat pay cheque in front of airmiles profs flown in for a night at the Dorchester, the college would treat invitations to give guest lectures as an honour.

Now comes the IF: This University Is Free project. I haven’t been involved in it, but have offered free teaching, and urge others who are in a position to do so to follow suit. IF aims to set up free humanities courses in London using the capital’s free cultural assets. They’re asking for kickstarter funding, initially for a summer school which will also serve as a pilot for a larger-scale operation to be launched later this year.

I know the case against. A one-off third-sector initiative is no real substitute for a properly funded state higher education sector. Sure. But it is not trying to be and the fact that the better-than-nothing is not ideal is no reason to let it be vanquished by the undeniably crap.

IF needs to raise £10,000 – just over half of one UK student’s annual fees at the NCH – by Tuesday 25 March to meet their kickstarter target. At the time of writing they’re about £2700 short and under kickstarter rules don’t get a bean if they fail to hit their target. So if you have some spare change or can shake down someone for a donation, please do.

For further information, write to contact@ifproject.co.uk.

Comments on “IF: This University Is Free”

  1. Glen Newey says:

    And a pretty daft one it is. Generally I find that Thatcher’s ‘chattering classes’ gibe is always liable to explode in the hands of leftists, and coming from someone who runs a personal blog it’s particularly asinine – but that irony is probably lost on McGettigan. I can’t see anything on the Kickstarter homepage that announces it’s ‘a website intended for start-up ventures’, as he says, the implication apparently being that the IF people might be hoping to make a quick buck. I assume that it’s not for profit, and so asking ‘how profits will move round and out of the company’ is a hunt for the snark. Maybe I’m wrong; I’ll find out when I talk to the IF people in London next week. It isn’t, as McGettigan says, a MOOC, at least to go by the IF website, which he’s happy to use when being snarky about whether it’s a social enterprise. It’s aiming as far as I can see to broaden access to university level education for those who can’t stump up 9 grand a year for the privilege. If the point is – he flails around comparing IF first to the NCH, then to Alain de Botton – that this isn’t much good compared with properly funded state higher education, I don’t know who he’s arguing with; not me, for reasons I indicated in the post. Hopefully state investment in HE will return, though not much is to be hoped for given mainstream parties’ current policies. In the meantime there is the question of what you can do to improve access to it for people. It’s nice for McGettigan – laboriously flagged up as ‘Dr. Andrew McGettigan’ on a Facebook page he’s set up to puff a talk he’s giving in Bath next week – that he’s already had the benefit of a university education. Not everybody is so lucky.

  2. amcgettigan says:

    My main point is simple. It hasn’t incorporated or associated formally – it’s two individuals fundraising so no one who doesn’t know them personally is in a position to make an informed position. Social enterprises needn’t be not-for-profit. And you can see that I have received different answers – first that they were seeking charitable status; later that they are taking legal advice on the matter.

    The Mooc/ online resources references are rife on the main website
    e.g. http://www.ifproject.co.uk/our-courses/

    There’s plenty else that can be done around these issues.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement