« | Home | »

At New York City Hall

Tags: |

Yesterday morning the plaza in front of New York’s City Hall was crowded with local luminaries, shivering under blankets and bundled in winter clothes. Celebrities and politicians, elders from the city’s ethnic communities, clergy and union leaders gathered to celebrate the inauguration of the new mayor, Bill de Blasio. Regular citizens were there too. That in itself was notable. De Blasio’s inauguration was the first open to the general public in recent memory.

De Blasio once described himself as a socialist. As a 26-year-old activist and supporter of the Sandinista revolution, he took part in a solidarity trip to Nicaragua. On his first day as mayor, though, he placed himself squarely in the tradition of New York liberals and social reformers. He invoked Fiorello La Guardia, the mayor who established the city’s social housing in the 1930s and 1940s, and swore his oath on a bible that once belonged to Franklin Roosevelt.

New York is now the most unequal city in the United States and, according to some estimates, the gap between rich and poor rivals Namibia’s. Nearly half the city’s residents live at or below the poverty line. As the cost of housing has soared, so have the number of homeless: 60,000, including 22,000 children. One of de Blasio’s campaign slogans was ‘a tale of two cities’, one for the rich and another for the rest.

In his inaugural address, de Blasio called inequality a ‘crisis’, and compared it to ‘fiscal collapse, a crime epidemic, terrorist attacks, and natural disasters’. He laid out a handful of concrete policy proposals, including a new tax (‘about the cost of a small soy latte’) on New Yorkers who make over $500,000 a year that will be used to pay for universal pre-school. His mission, he said, is a ‘march toward a fairer, more just, more progressive place’.

Sitting behind the new mayor on the stage in front of City Hall was the man who worked there until the day before. Michael Bloomberg does not look amused easily, but he had reason to frown on New Year’s morning. In one remark after another, speakers castigated his 12-year reign. (Bloomberg fought to change term limit laws to allow himself a third term.) Opening the ceremony, Reverend Fred Lucas of Brooklyn Community Church described New York as a ‘plantation’ and prayed that the new administration would deliver ‘emancipation’. Other speakers made digs at the former mayor’s policies, such as supporting the building of a massive sports arena when there was a desperate shortage of affordable housing, or introducing stop-and-frisk policing, which a federal court recently ruled illegally targets New York’s black and Latino men. The only New Yorker with anything positive to say about the outgoing mayor was his successor.

(London’s mayor, another quirky ‘moderate’ with a media background, plenty of money and a penchant for ‘pragmatic’ problem solving, might take note. Bloomberg and Boris Johnson are said to be friends and through their overlapping years have held more than a few high-profile summits. And the growth in inequality in London has largely kept pace with New York.)

American liberals are taking heart. But anyone who thinks a new New Deal is coming to America’s cities shouldn’t hold their breath. For one thing, de Blasio chose a former Goldman Sachs executive to head his housing initiative. But most important, it’s not clear what the new mayor can do to take on one of the biggest drivers of inequality: finance. Wall Street’s power and influence is far more than a municipal issue.

Comments on “At New York City Hall”

  1. Harry Stopes says:

    The problem with seeing de Blasio as the vanguard of a new progressive (or even socialist) wave in American politics is that being the Mayor of New York is different to any other job in US politics. There are easy wins available to him through measures such as the new tax on very high earners that he’s proposed. There are a lot of extremely rich people around in Manhattan (and parts of Brooklyn), and though they’ll no doubt moan they can easily afford the extra cost and – crucially – they won’t be pushed out of the city because for cultural/social reasons it’s too attractive a place, and they want to stay. Could the mayor of Detroit, Baltimore, or Houston achieve much success with the same policies?

    In a similar vein, Ken Livingstone used to complain that tax money that was made for the (national) exchequer in London was distributed around the rest of the country, leaving too little to be spent in London (even though per capita spend in London is still much higher than elsewhere.) He used to say that London was “subsidising” poor parts of the country, an odd argument for a self-proclaimed socialist. Like Livingstone, de Blasio’s best hope is to practice ‘socialism in one city’, and as such it doesn’t provide much of a model for transforming national politics.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement