« | Home | »

Nelson Mandela

Tags: |

Nelson Mandela’s death, at the age of 95, comes as a relief. He should have been allowed the dignity of only dying once. In the past two years, in and out of hospital, he seldom recognised his wife Graça Machel, his former wife Winnie, his children or his old comrades from the ANC. What is more, since the end of his presidency in 1999, the ‘rainbow nation’ had been dying with him.

Mandela’s successor, Thabo Mbeki, a champion of the ‘African Renaissance’, was an ideologue whose beliefs cost the lives of 300,000 HIV-positive South Africans: he denied them access to antiretroviral drugs. The current head of state, Jacob Zuma, is most flatteringly referred to as ‘a man of the people’ – Chinua Achebe’s postcolonial curse. He presides over a republic of grifters and grafters. The recently excluded leader of the ANC Youth League, Julius Malema, is not even a remote heir to the Mandela legacy, though Mandela was a ‘young Turk’ of the party in his day: Malema is a hard man doubling as an agent provocateur.

Until his 70th birthday in 1988 and the Wembley solidarity concert, which turned the negative ‘Down with apartheid!’ into the positive ‘Free Mandela!’, the man on Robben Island was regarded by Western governments as a terrorist. In detention he was forgotten in the early 1970s and then eclipsed by Steve Biko and the Black Consciousness Movement. He was resurrected as the figurehead of a mass movement, largely thanks to Winnie Mandela’s combativeness, and became the grand old man of the ANC – a role Walter Sisulu or Govan Mbeki could also have played. In the end, Mandela was and wasn’t the embodiment of the ANC. He led the country in a peaceful post-apartheid settlement – a political miracle – but behind his back and even before he left the presidential office, party stalwarts and the ‘comrades in business’ had begun to exercise their muscle.

Mandela took the hero’s approach to adversity. In 1963, having been held incommunicado for 90 days during which the police had assured them that they would all be hanged, the leadership of the ANC finally met with their lawyers only to be told they should ‘prepare for the worst’. In his four-hour closing statement at the Rivonia trial, Mandela pleaded guilty in the name of his ideal of ‘a democratic society with equal opportunities for all’. When he sat down again on the bench, he tried to cheer up his co-defendants: ‘I don’t want to die but if this leads to death, the first thing I’ll do on arrival is to join the local branch of the ANC.’ The remark would have been impossible in his last moments, half a century on.

Comments on “Nelson Mandela”

  1. RobotBoy says:

    I remember watching Mandela’s interview with Ted Koppel on network TV soon after his release. Koppel tried to call him out for the ANC’s links to Cuba and the PLO. Mandela said that they had supported the ANC when no one else would, and he wasn’t going to criticize them to make America happy. His serenity and control – his aura – were astonishing. ‘I’m watching a great man,’ I thought, for the first time in my life. It’s heartbreaking that his legacy is so troubled.

  2. stanly says:

    It was recently i read Henning Mankell’s The White Lioness. It’s all about Nelson Mandela and the transition of South Africa, though Mandela is not directly present in the novel. While unraveling an assassination plot, Mankell offers a repulsive account of the apartheid South Africa–the deep state, a society on the brink of collapse, institutionalized racism, rampant poverty, etc. If the novel, written in 1993, offers any lining of hope, it was Nelson Mandela. Obviously, that was the mood in the early 1990s. Twenty years later, when Mandela lies in his little box, still, it’s worth asking whether he lived up to the hopes of his people. History will give us mixed answers. Once in power, Mandela and his party, ANC, backed off from several of their earlier promises. ANC initiated rampant privatization, which, as journalist John Pilger said, led to the beginning of an “economic apartheid” and stayed away from radical overhaul of the system in the name of “reconciliation”. A black bourgeoisie took the reins of South Africa from the White racists, when hopes were strangulated. This is not to question the greatness of Mandela. He was, of course, a great man. Without him, South Africa would have been a much worse place for his people. But he could have made their lives much better than what it’s now if he continued his glorious fights in the post-apartheid South Africa.

  3. Simon Wood says:

    He was pushed into bothering far more than he may have done normally. No wonder he sympathised with those who put him away. That’s how he became the George Best of politics, well Pele, Eusebio, maybe. And no wonder no-one can match up to him there, unless anyone else is willing to be put away for a lifetime of 27 years.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement