« | Home | »

Against ‘la mano dura’

Tags: |

One of the parties contesting Sunday’s election in Honduras has seen 18 of its activists murdered in the last 18 months. The LIBRE party’s presidential candidate is Xiomara Castro, the wife of the former president Manuel Zelaya, who was deposed in the military coup of July 2009. Despite the intimidation, LIBRE shows signs of breaking the cronyism of Honduran politics. Since the end of the dictatorship in 1982, the National Party and the Liberals, both products of the traditional oligarchy, have traded the presidency without disrupting the dominance of the 13 families that run the country. (Zelaya was a Liberal; the incumbent, Porfirio Lobo Sosa, is a Nationalist.) The current Liberal candidate is well behind, but the last opinion poll (they are banned in the month before polling day) gave the National Party’s Juan Orlando Hernández a one-point lead over Castro. The oligarchy is clearly rattled.

Hernández is an exponent of what Latin Americans call ‘la mano dura’ (the firm hand). He says he’ll put ‘a soldier on every corner’ to deal with the violence that makes Honduras one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Castro is decidedly less confrontational. She emphasises her proposal for a constitutional assembly that would reconfigure Honduran politics to give a voice to the poorest sectors and the many groups (teachers, artists, journalists, human rights activists) currently being persecuted. This was the project that Zelaya was pushing when he was forced from power. Castro’s other policies also borrow from her husband’s, which succeeded in narrowing the gap between rich and poor (it has since grown bigger again). While Hernández says he’ll meet violence with violence, Castro points to a pre-coup economy that was growing faster and with lower poverty and unemployment.

Will she be allowed to win? Hernández has not been idle. As head of Congress, he’s posted his own man as attorney general for an illegal five-year term. He defied the constitution again by replacing four members of the constitutional court when they had the temerity to throw out his plans to set up a new system of model cities, the pet project of a bunch of US neoliberals longing to test it out in ‘unoccupied’ land in Honduras. He has ensured that the army distribute and collect the ballot boxes for Sunday’s poll, so he controls both the election process and any legal challenges to it.

According to Dana Frank, Hernández ‘has all the ducks lined up for a fraudulent election’. Three US congressmen have written to John Kerry to express alarm that one presidential candidate ‘now dominates all the key institutions of the government’.

While its influence in much of Latin America is on the wane, in Honduras the US can still be decisive in calling an election as fair or not. After the coup in June 2009, its equivocation allowed the golpistas to succeed. Perhaps mindful of having appeared indecisive earlier, Hillary Clinton quickly called the post-coup elections as fair, despite widespread violence and massive abstentions. In the build-up to Sunday’s poll, Obama’s government has voiced concern about rising violence in Honduras and called for ‘free and fair’ elections. But it hasn’t condemned the violence against LIBRE, or responded to the continuing assassinations of indigenous leaders and journalists. The worry is not only that the ruling party in Honduras can manipulate Sunday’s poll, but that it may already have persuaded the State Department to endorse the result.

Comments on “Against ‘la mano dura’”

  1. Laserjpb says:

    Senator Tim Kaine and a dozen other prominent Democratic senators have also issued a public letter to the State Department, http://www.kaine.senate.gov/press-releases/in-letter-to-secretary-kerry-kaine-calls-for-free-and-fair-elections-in-honduras

  2. John Perry says:

    As the polls take place today (Sunday)initial reports such as the one below suggest that, while there have been various problems of intimidation and some violence, and of polling stations opening late, in general polling is going reasonably well. See http://sistemasamigables.com/disenos/cespad/TemplateCespad21.html

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement