« | Home | »

At Tate Britain


01_Principal Level Rotunda_(c)_Helene Binet

‘Poor Tate! It seems to get the rough end of every stick,’ Ian Nairn wrote in Nairn’s London, trapped in its ‘pompous, confused building’. The early 1960s had no patience with 1890s histrionic classicism, the work of Henry Tate’s more or less in-house architect, Sidney Smith.

By 1969 the trustees had decided on drastic action, blanking out the Millbank frontage with a weak, sub-Brutalist façade designed by Llewelyn-Davies, Weeks, Forestier-Walker and Bor (architects did not hide behind acronyms then). To their apparent surprise, the bland design and the implied scorn for the original building provoked an outcry. The 1897 Tate, its portico surmounted by Britannia flanked by her lion and unicorn, survived.
The columned, temple-fronted entrance rearing above its torrent of steps is now centre stage once more. As the architect Adam Caruso puts it, ‘the distinction between new and old is less interesting to our generation than the previous one,’ and Caruso St John’s approach is to ‘sustain and amplify’ the key aspects of the existing building. Logic is back, but so too is ornament.
The heart of the revamp lies beyond the greatly clarified entrance hall – new doors and windows, bringing back natural light, clear, uncluttered space and a much better view back to the river – and is entirely new. Under the Rotunda, Caruso St John have punched in an eye-catching Fred-and-Ginger swirl of staircase leading downstairs. The stairs peel down out of a vortex of black and white scale-patterned terrazzo flooring, the same motif used on the punched stone balustrade. The monochrome palette follows Smith’s 1890s example.
Past the stairs, the way to the galleries (the south-east section was reopened in May) leads through the central octagon and, beyond, into the Duveen Galleries. The ground floor is now admirably legible.

Downstairs, the scheme includes education spaces and the archive. Through the windows of the new vaulted café there’s a glimpse of the Thames; the restaurant above is wrapped in Rex Whistler’s entrancing 1927 murals, restored and relit. High above, just below the Rotunda, there’s a spectacular (members-only) balconied café bar – in an area out of bounds since the 1920s – while the Grand Saloon, once more, is just that.

02_Lower Level Rotunda_(c)_Helene Binet

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement