« | Home | »

Ban HGVs, not headphones

Tags: | |

Six cyclists have been killed on London’s streets in the last fortnight. On 5 November Brian Holt, a hospital porter from Aldgate, was hit by a lorry on Cycle Superhighway 2 in Mile End. On 7 November a man died after a collision with a bus in Croydon. Last week Francis Golding was hit by a coach at the corner of Southampton Row and Theobalds Road. He later died in hospital. On Wednesday morning a woman was hit by a heavy goods vehicle as she cycled round Bow roundabout, where two other cyclists have died this year. Another man died on Thursday morning after he was hit by a bus at the junction of Whitechapel Road and Commercial Road on Wednesday night. He was also cycling along CS2. Yesterday, a cyclist was killed in a collision with an HGV in Camberwell. Another was hit in Camden in the afternoon, and three more are in hospital with serious injuries. Fourteen cyclists have died in London so far this year.

In an interview with LBC radio last week, Boris Johnson appeared to suggest that at least some of these deaths were the fault of the victims:

Unless people obey the laws of the road and people actively take account of the signals that we put in, there’s no amount of traffic engineering that we invest in that is going to save people’s lives… If you take these hasty, rash decisions that we’re seeing sometimes, then you will be endangering your life.

Last year the mayor claimed that 62 per cent of cyclists killed or seriously injured in London had committed ‘some infraction of the rules of the road’. He later admitted that he’d been told the statistic at a mayoral hustings meeting and didn’t have a source for it.

The London Cycling Campaign has long argued that the Cycle Superhighway network is badly thought through and dangerous. Johnson trumpets his investment in cycling but seems fundamentally unwilling to challenge the dominance of motor traffic in London, preferring to spend money on more visible projects, such as painting tarmac blue and installing Boris bikes. Ashok Sinha, the chief executive of the LCC, has said that a proposal for a safer crossing for cyclists and pedestrians at Bow roundabout was rejected because it would have caused delays to traffic. Earlier this year Johnson seemed more interested in expanding the cycle hire scheme with electric bikes than in improving the existing infrastructure.

In 2010 Johnson suggested he might ban lorries from central London, but these days Jenny Jones seems to be the only member of the London Assembly contemplating an outright ban on HGVs during rush hour. The mayor would rather ban cyclists from wearing headphones. Jones has repeatedly challenged Johnson’s claims that London’s roads are safer for cyclists than they were when he took office. ‘The reality is that they are safer than they were twelve years ago, but they have become more dangerous since he was elected,’ she says. The statistics back her up.

Yesterday morning the Met’s ‘Safer Transport Command’ stopped cyclists during rush hour. They told people off for not wearing hi-viz and helmets. Wearing a helmet is not a legal requirement and it is far from clear that they make cyclists any safer on the roads. It is unlikely that any of the cyclists killed in London this year would have been protected by wearing one. Several of them were.

Comments on “Ban HGVs, not headphones”

  1. DaveyG says:

    While the cycling infrastructure needs clear improvement, it is also clear that many cyclists take absurd risks (as both a cyclist and driver i see this all the time). Banning headphones is a positive step because, as Boris says, you cant hear traffic. HGV involvement in accidents need to be addressed too and quickly (I was nearly wiped out by one recently despite clearly cycling in a lane as per my right) but surely this can be done in tandem with cyclist safety initiatives.

    Maybe “ban HGVs and headphones” would be a more appropriate title?

  2. Joe says:

    It would be interesting to know the comparative degree to which one is aurally connected to one’s surroundings when (on one hand) cycling while listing to music on headphones at a moderate volume and (on the other) driving with the windows closed while listening to the car stereo. We wouldn’t want to accuse cyclists of ‘taking absurd risks’ if the behaviors in question were equivalent to those we see as totally unproblematic in other road users, I’m sure.

    Also, while it’s good and necessary to look as widely as possible for the causes of cyclist deaths, there does also need to be evidence. HGVs have been brought up because they feature in a hugely disproportionate number of cyclist deaths; does a similar statistic exist in connection with use of headphones, or is this just a convenient way of expressing the feeling that the victims of these accidents must *surely* be partly to blame?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement