« | Home | »

Climate Change Vulnerability

Tags: |

Two weeks ago, Maplecroft published its sixth annual Climate Change Vulnerability Index. Maplecroft calls itself ‘the world’s leading global risk analytics, research and strategic forecasting company’; its ‘technological solutions identify emerging trends, business opportunities and risks to investments and supply chains worldwide’. The index didn’t get much media attention, though the Philippine Star reported that the Philippines ranks as the ninth most vulnerable country.

Maplecroft calculates the risk ‘by evaluating three factors’: ‘exposure to extreme climate-related events’, ‘the sensitivity of populations’ and countries’ ‘adaptive capacity’. There is a straightforward correlation between poverty and risk: richer countries are better prepared – they have more adaptive capacity and less sensitive populations. Supertyphoon Haiyan was one of the most powerful storms ever recorded, but that isn’t the only reason it was so deadly; if it had made landfall somewhere wealthier than Leyte and Samar, it would probably have killed fewer than 10,000 people. (Hurricane Katrina was less powerful than Sandy, but killed more than six times as many people.)

At the opening of the UN climate talks in Warsaw today, Yeb Saño, the Philippines’ chief negotiator, said he would ‘voluntarily refrain from eating food’ during the talks ‘until a meaningful outcome is in sight’. He was given a standing ovation. Delegates had tears in their eyes. But a ‘meaningful outcome’ is something else. Last week the World Meteorological Organisation announced that the ‘atmospheric increase of CO2 from 2011 to 2012 was higher than its average growth rate over the past ten years.’

Tropical Depression Zoraida is tonight heading towards the Philippines, bringing winds of up to 60 kph and up to 15 mm of rain.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement