« | Home | »

Pseudo Cycle Lanes

Tags: |

A few days ago a coroner released a report on the deaths of two cyclists killed in London. Both died while cycling along Cycle Superhighway 2, which runs from Bow to Aldgate. Both were hit by heavy goods vehicles. One of them, Philippine De Gerin-Ricard, was riding a Boris Bike.

The report suggests that the Cycle Superhighways, strips of road painted blue for use by cyclists, are inherently confusing and often dangerous, something the London Cycling Campaign has been arguing for some time. The coroner said that much of CS2 amounts to a pseudo cycle lane, lacking the the white edging that would make it legally enforceable and lulling cyclists ‘into a false sense of security’.

The police agree, saying that some of the lanes are ‘ambiguous’ and ‘lead to confusion’. The coroner concluded that there ‘is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken’, and asked Boris Johnson and TFL to respond by 16 December.

On Saturday the London Cycling Campaign held its annual general meeting. It resolved that ‘Cyclists should not be expected to share space with motor vehicles moving above 20mph’ and ‘If cyclists will share space with motor traffic, volumes must be low.’

At mayor’s question time yesterday Johnson was asked what he planned to do about the recent deaths on CS2. ‘I can’t guarantee to Londoners that we are going to produce segregation everywhere that it is desired. I’m afraid that is simply not a realistic objective because there isn’t the road space to do it. The difficulty is that in many cases you take away a huge amount of road space and perhaps don’t deliver the safety improvements that you desire, because, speaking as a daily cyclist, one of the problems that many full-time cyclists have with the segregated option is that actually they don’t always use the segregated gulleys, and I’m not quite convinced it would be the knock-out solution.’ But perhaps we’d be more likely to use them if they were designed with cyclists, rather than cycle-friendly PR, in mind.

The Green Party’s Jenny Jones accused the mayor of not being ‘a normal cyclist’, saying he had ‘a weird view about how these junctions are good for energy levels and adrenaline and that sort of thing, you love them. Most cyclists don’t, they’re frightened of them.’ Jones has said that cycling injuries have increased under Johnson’s mayoralty. He disputes this, but TFL seems to agree. A couple of weeks ago it published a study showing that the number of cyclists killed or seriously injured in London was 18 per cent higher in 2012 than in 2011, and confirming that ‘HGVs are disproportionately involved in fatal pedal cycle collisions, with 53 per cent of pedal cycle fatalities between 2008 and 2012 involving direct conflict with a HGV.’

If cycle superhighways are at best cosmetic and at worst inherently dangerous, maybe it’s time to ban HGVs from central London during rush hour. A year ago Paris began regulating HGV delivery times in Ville de Paris, partly in an attempt reduce pollution. It remains to be seen what effect this will have on cycling fatalities, but last week the mayor extended the scheme, announcing plans to ban traffic entirely from some of the busiest routes along the Seine, replacing them with cycle lanes.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement