« | Home | »

Seeking Truth from Facts


Bo Xilai’s fall from power was both dramatic and swift. The charismatic former Party secretary of Chongqing, once thought a candidate for a top government position, was dismissed in March 2012, accused of widespread corruption and abuse of power. At the same time his estranged wife, Gu Kailai, was arrested for the murder of the British businessman Neil Heywood. In the following months the curtain of secrecy that usually conceals China’s political elite was yanked aside, as tales of Bo’s wealth and his family’s extravagant lifestyle spread.

His trial began on 22 August. Most high profile trials in China are tightly controlled pieces of theatre, in which the verdict is predetermined and the accused plays the part of a repentant villain. But Bo seemed to be following a different script. He said his earlier confession had been coerced, and described Tang Xiaolin, a businessmen who claimed to have bribed him, as a ‘mad dog’. After a devastating cross-examination of another witness, Bo echoed a Maoist slogan by thanking him for ‘seeking truth from facts’. As for his wife’s testimony against him, Bo said she was a convicted murderer with a history of mental illness, as well as ‘a person of culture and taste, a woman of modern thinking’.

Bo’s performance elicited admiration on Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, but few thought it would alter the trial’s outcome. ‘No matter how Bo performs,’ the People’s Daily said, ‘how he lies, it is all only a display of strength to hide the weakness inside.’

There was also disagreement about the extent to which Bo’s actions were officially sanctioned, with some arguing that even his apparent defiance had been approved in order to make the trial seem fair: it may or may not be significant that he didn’t at any point attack his political superiors.

Of course even to call it a ‘trial’ is a misnomer – whether or not Bo committed any crimes is no more certain than before. If any ‘truth’ has emerged from the proceedings, it has been in the portrait of a family whose lives have been distorted by power and influence, legally acquired or not. In addition to fresh tales of excess — such as Bo’s son going on a jaunt with his friends to Mount Kilimanjaro and bringing back ‘a piece of meat from a very exotic animal’ which the family then argued about how to cook — it emerged that Bo hit his deputy Wang Lijun in the face after finding out he’d been having an affair with his wife.

The verdict has yet to be announced, but there’s no doubt Bo will be found guilty. A death sentence is theoretically possible, but a long prison term more likely. A more open question is what lessons the Chinese public will take from this show trial. The intended message is presumably that no one is above the law, and that corruption is the exception rather than the rule. But there have been too many scandals involving high profile officials in China over the last few years for any real doubt to remain about how pervasive corruption is. As a recent editorial in Caixin argued, the case ‘is proof that a mechanism must be set up to limit the power of officials, prevent their relatives from using their offices for private gain, and require officials to make their assets and finances public’. But this would require transparency throughout the political system – the lack of which is precisely what the rule of the Party has been based on.

As for Bo Xilai, though his political career is probably over — despite the frequency of second and even third acts in Chinese politics — his conduct during the trial may have been enough to restore his reputation in some people’s minds. As one of my Chinese friends put it, ‘he was corrupt like many other leaders but unlike them he also did things for the people.’

Comments on “Seeking Truth from Facts”

  1. Julia Atkins says:

    A good piece. A few questions. Is it accurate to carry on describing Neil Heywood as a ‘businessman’. Some have referred to him as a British Intelligence asset. If true, wouldn’t be a surprise. Secondly: has the mystery of why Wang Lijun defected to the US Consulate been properly explained? Was it his idea alone or suggested to him and if so by whom?
    Bo’s performance was stellar, much more effective than the arrogance displayed by Mao’s widow after her fall. This would indicate that Bo himself
    does not regard his career as over. Being abused by the Economist and the Financial Times as a populist will only enhance his popularity, since these two publications use the term as an abuse against any politician who attempts to do something for the poor. His popularity has been attested to by the Politburo itself: a spin doctor told the FT’s James Anderlini soon after Bo’s fall that the West should realise that were China to adopt democracy as the West demanded, Bo would be elected President. But there would be no chance of this if China adopted a US-style democracy.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement