« | Home | »

In Tahrir Square

Tags:

At midday on Sunday the temperature hovered around 33 degrees in Tahrir Square. People crowded into the shade but didn’t give up their chanting and flag waving. In the late afternoon, as the sun began to set and the temperature dropped, flag wavers, drummers, horn honkers and angry chanters set out from across Cairo towards either Tahrir Square or the Presidential Palace, protesting against President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood’s polarising style of governance, and their failure to revive the economy and restore security. The numbers were ‘unprecedented’, even for a country that has seen its share of ‘unprecedented’ protests over the past three years. Simultaneous demonstrations were held throughout the country, from the cities on the Suez Canal to the agricultural heartland of the Nile Delta to more conservative Upper Egypt. Some estimated the turnout in the millions.

The military made its presence felt throughout the day – and has done since – with black Apache helicopters. They have been buzzing low over Cairo constantly for three days. The first time I saw them over Tahrir Square the crowd of thousands erupted into cheering: ‘The army and the people are one hand!’ (a chant that first emerged during the 2011 uprising when, after the police forces fled, the army deployed to the streets) and “Long live Egypt!” When I asked people why they were ecstatic about the sight of an apache flying over a protest – rather than alarmed – I was told that the army is “our army” and will protect the Egyptians.

When Mohamed Ali Pasha established the modern Egyptian state in the 19th century, the creation of a European-style army was a central part of the nation-building project. His great-great-grandson was overthrown in 1952 by a group of young army officers. Nasser, Sadat and Mubarak all rose to power from within the military’s ranks. The 6 October Bridge, a causeway that spans much of Cairo and one of the biggest public works projects in recent memory, is named for the date that the army crossed the Suez Canal to fight the Israelis occupying the Sinai Peninsula in 1973.

The change of power in 2011 was a palace coup riding the wave of a genuine popular uprising. The generals, seeing that Mubarak’s days were numbered, forced him to leave office while preserving most of the state’s institutions. The military has huge economic interests, though no one knows how exactly how huge (estimates of up to 40 per cent of GDP are probably exaggerations). It has holdings in everything from real estate to poultry farming to machine part manufacturing. Retired military men have the pick of jobs in both the private and the public sector. The army has traditionally had far more control over foreign policy than the foreign ministry. When protesters say that the army ‘defends Egypt’, they are right. The army’s primary concern is its own well-being, and a stable Egypt is essential for its business interests.

A week before the protests began, as crisis loomed between President Morsi and his opponents (seemingly everyone in the country except a core contingent of Islamists), General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, the commander of the armed forces, announced that the two sides had a week to reach an agreement. Both the Muslim Brotherhood and the opposition ignored the ultimatum. Crisis came, as scheduled, on 30 June. Yesterday al-Sisi released a statement calling on ‘political forces’ to meet the people’s demands within 48 hours. If they don’t, the army will fulfil its ‘historical duty toward our country and the great people of Egypt’. What this means remains to be seen, but a military coup in one form or another seems likely. The helicopters are still circling overhead.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement