« | Home | »

Cash for Internships

Tags: |

Last month, Westminster School raised more than £7000 by auctioning internships with bankers, artists and barristers and a host of other placements set up by the private school’s alumni. Louise Tickle in the Guardian compared the auction to a Tory fundraising event in 2011, when party supporters stumped up thousands to get their children through the doors of hedge funds and banks.

Private schools and the Tory party aren’t the only ones at it. The week before Tickle’s piece was published, Highbury Grove, a state comprehensive, auctioned a day’s work experience at the Guardian. Last December, the New Statesman, which has published a number of pieces criticising internship auctions, put up for sale a week’s work experience at its offices. The starting bid at the Olympics Ball (raising money to support British athletes) was £1000.

Even when you don’t have to pay to get an internship, you will probably be expected to work for free, which comes to much the same thing. The campaign group Intern Aware wrote an open letter condemning Westminster’s auction. Seven MPs put their names to it. It isn’t surprising that so few spoke out, given how many MPs have hired unpaid interns – including almost half of those who signed the letter.

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority keeps track of the unpaid workers that MPs take on, as the state covers their expenses. According to the last IPSA report, released in 2012, three of the MPs condemning Westminster School – Labour’s Rachel Reeves and the Lib Dems Julian Huppert and Mike Crockart – had taken on unpaid interns intern volunteers. But at least they have mended their ways (or at any rate stopped advertising unpaid internships on the Working for an MP website).

If you hurry you can still win a week at Ronit Capital, a hedge fund management company (current bid $550; the auction closes this evening). The proceeds will go to a charity, Gabrielle’s Angel Foundation for Cancer Research – after the auctioneer takes a 20 per cent cut.

Marx warned that a reserve army of unemployed workers would eventually drive wages down to the bare minimum necessary for labour to survive. Yet even he didn’t imagine a future in which an army of unemployed graduates would not only work unpaid, but compete with each other over who would pay their employers the most.

This post was amended on 12 June in response to a message from Mike Crockart MP: ‘In your most recent blog post “Cash For Interns” which quite rightly attacks the dreadful practice of auctioning internships you also unfortunately equate the list published by IPSA which talks of intern volunteers as being unpaid interns. This is not necessarily the case. I can categorically state that during 2012 I did not employ any unpaid interns. I have however given short periods of work experience to a number of school-leavers which I know each of them found extremely useful. Indeed, far from employing unpaid interns, I have been working with InternAware to stop the practice and regularly write out to Edinburgh employers who advertise such positions urging them to stop and offering them help to find alternative ways to employ young people. Could I ask therefore that you correct the record and not repeat this error. Many thanks Mike’

Comments on “Cash for Internships”

  1. Eric Auerbach says:

    So glad Mr. Crockart drew attention to the author’s conflation of “unpaid intern” and “intern volunteer.” Had it not been for him, we the readers might never have been able to tell the two apart.

  2. Joe says:

    In Mike Crockart’s case, there may be some genuine distinction between ‘work experience’ for ‘school-leavers’ – perhaps if the placements are sufficiently short, and the individuals of an age at which they’re likely to still be living at home, then the practice is less socially selective than the longer internships that are routinely undertaken in many industries by people in their mid twenties and beyond.

    However, the use of ‘voluntary work’ as a euphemism for what anyone should understand as an unpaid internship seems to be widespread. My understanding of ‘volunteering’ is of something principally undertaken out of altruism, maybe a few hours a week, not a full-time position that it is necessary to undertake in order to find work. But as a ‘volunteer’ at the Victoria and Albert Museum a few years back, I, and all the other volunteers around me, were certainly in the former of those two situations.

  3. Harry Stopes says:

    I agree that Crockhart may not be being disingenuous, though of course I don’t know anything about the people he’s had working/volunteering for him. The key characteristic of ‘work experience’ for a young person, if its unpaid, should be that its short term, that its beneficial to the ‘worker’ in terms of skills or knowledge of a particular industry gained, and that the ’employer’ doesn’t really need you that much but takes you on as a favour. If, like many interns, you have a long term position, hours during which you are expected to work, key responsibilities you must perform, and you are essential to the functioning of the organisation, you’re a worker and you should be paid, end of story.

    I once saw an ad on a design jobs website for a graphic designer with 2 years experience, preferably some knowledge of spreadsheets/admin, and knowledge of the hotels industry, to work a 6 month job designing interior of a new hotel. Unpaid.

  4. JonathanDawid says:

    “Marx warned that a reserve army of unemployed workers would eventually drive wages down to the bare minimum necessary for labour to survive. Yet even he didn’t imagine a future in which an army of unemployed graduates would not only work unpaid, but compete with each other over who would pay their employers the most.”

    He did not need to imagine it, since in his day it was common for apprentices to have to pay their masters. Indeed it is within living memory that pupil barristers had to pay their pupilmasters for the honour of doing their legal research. Far from a new development, I would suggest we are seeing re-Victorianisation of working conditions.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement