« | Home | »

Farewell, David Miliband

Tags:

We have been here before. I blogged unkind things about David Miliband when he was being log-rolled by the Blairite machine, as bathed in the blood of Tony, so brilliant, so cool, so je ne sais quoi as to be very nigh compulsory.

The reality, when he didn’t get the assured leadership, has been a sulking minimalist in the Commons, above all that low, grinding trouble.

Compare Margaret Beckett, his predecessor at the Foreign Office, chasing the palm, but enjoying the dust. She was avid, slippery, ultra-left in the 1960s, many-sided, hard-working, a useful pragmatist when demanding jobs came in sight – a proper politician.

Yesterday’s flight to New York is Miliband’s self-pity gone public. ‘You’ll be sorry when I’m dead.’

Anyway what are we supposed to be losing? He is spa water gone luke-warm, ex-sparkling, feeble by pre-emption. His career took off courtesy of Gordon Brown demonstrating outreach to prime Blair material. Miliband was able to run as precisely that in the leadership election.

Today, with the door open to major front bench responsibility, he is unwilling to serve the party that didn’t crown him. The sulking minimalist in the Commons disdains the Cabinet. In truth David Miliband is too small for serious politics.

Comments on “Farewell, David Miliband”

  1. SpinningHugo says:

    Sheesh. Sour hardly covers this.

    ‘Sulking minimalist’ was not such a good line as to require repetition either.

  2. Neil says:

    Tend to agree with this assessment (never liked DM myself), but apparently many in the PLP, wider Party, and MSM would not. Given that for many of these he was the ‘king-in-waiting’ of the blairite-right one wonders what socio-psychological impact his departure will have on the Party – especially as, at the same time – potentially threatening challenges seem to be emerging on the left.

  3. gareth mac says:

    One must assume that it’s personal then. Because you assessment doesn’t stand up to srutiny as the Labour Party are desperate for heavyweights to add gravitas to a party which still seems to rely on Ed Balls schoolboy tactics for headlines and don’t seem capable of reigining him in thereby undermining the party’s claims to provide serious opposition. Even UKIP is getting mentioned in political debate as an alternative which speaks volumes. Where are all the grown-ups; oh they appear to be going abroad.

  4. Joe says:

    Is this the same Mr Pearce that told Liverpudlians in 1989 that “a good and sufficient number of you behave like animals” – or was that just a more famous namesake?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Timothy Rogers on In Philadelphia: The closing sentence of this report is true, and very ominous at that. The critical question then becomes, of the voters who actually turn out in Nov...
    • Charles Turner on England, Secede!: The arguments for brexit were dominated by the alleged need to control immigration. Wouldn't there have to be a serious physical border - a fence - b...
    • Locus on England, Secede!: People in Ireland really hate it when people from Britain (or Jersey, I guess) use the term "Eire." They think it sounds outdated, inaccurate and cond...
    • bggilmore on Cleveland, Day Two: I cruised through Atlantic City, New Jersey recently. Trump has some dead casinos there. He doesn't own them and yet his name is still on the building...
    • Timothy Rogers on Cleveland, Day Three: The question isn't her lying (she's an amateur compared to Trump on this front), but whether or not she's more suitable (and less dangerous) than Trum...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement