« | Home | »

Cameron’s Euro Fudge

Tags: | |

Is Britain going to ‘leave Europe’? The phrase has a slightly absurd ring, as if UK politicians could speed up continental drift and deposit the country somewhere off Massachusetts. In fact, the Atlanticist Europhobes in the Tory party and UKIP had been swatted even before the prime minister made his ‘defining’ speech on Europe, as Obama’s people made clear that the president had told Cameron he wants Britain to stay in. No matter. UKIP is on a roll and Cameron’s running scared. A Sun poll had the purple party on 11 per cent in November, which could do all manner of damage to Cameron’s re-election chances, even though the Liberal Democrat vote sits like a chocolate rabbit on a radiator, waiting for the heating to come on, and the Conservatives stand to benefit most from their partners’ meltdown.

Hence Wednesday’s handbag-swinging over Europe – or rather ‘Europe’, which has long done duty as an all-weather bad-karma dumpster for the Tory right. But as their former deputy chair Michael Ashcroft noted recently, ‘an in-out referendum on the EU is not the answer to the question of how to win back potential UKIP defectors to the Tories’. UKIP is a single-issue party: its only other showcase policy – no to to gay marriage – obviously aims at peeling off disgruntled blue-heads, but only makes UKIP look (even more) bizarre, as if Stonewall were suddenly to interest itself in fishery quotas. Another UKIP peculiarity is that many of its supporters seem not to care much about its single issue anyway, perhaps because they’ve realised that not that much cash or power is at stake. UKIP boomed after November’s Rotherham by-election fostering rowlet, But in the longer term its support may be squashy, while insofar as its supporters worry less about Europe than about the economy and cuts to services, an EU referendum is unlikely to win them over to the Tories.

Moreover, what it’s a good idea to say, politically, depends not just on what’s said but who’s saying it. If the problem is the UK’s sclerotic political establishment, Cameron is not best placed to articulate it. In fact, there’s only one script that does the trick for Cameron: he wins in 2015, claws back sovereignty from the EU, before asking for, and winning, UK voters’ assent to the new deal. All other branches of the game-tree lead to catastrophe, either in the form of career-wrecking credibility loss or a UK exit from the EU – maybe, though probably not, without Scotland. And, even before getting over the 2015 election hurdle, Cameron runs the risk – as happened in 1997 – that branding Europe as the UK’s bête noire makes it harder for the Tories credibly to demonise Labour at the same time.

There is a democratic deficit in EU institutions, and as the 50th anniversary of Adenauer and de Gaulle’s Friendship Pact this week underlined, the EU is mainly a Franco-German show: a recent televised exchange between Helmut Schmidt and Giscard d’Estaing brought home how committed leading actors in the EU and its forerunners have been to a single Euro-state. But exit, as Cameron knows, is far from cost-free. After the US, the UK’s next seven leading export partners are in the EU. It will be interesting to see how many UK exporters to France and Germany will want to cheer on risking a return to tariff barriers. Meanwhile, though Angela Merkel has been polite about Cameron’s in/out, there have been suggestions that – as English nationalists sometimes mutter about Scottish independence – separation might be pre-empted by blackballing.

Cameron now finds himself in a similar position to John Major’s in 1995. Then too the Tory PM’s biggest problem was EU-hating backbenchers ready to use the leverage conferred by the government’s thin majority. Major tried to lance the Eurosceptic boil by resigning as leader and winning the resulting leadership election; the boil, duly lanced, went septic. Cameron may win in 2015 if Labour sticks to its anti-referendum line but he is unlikely to win by much. Then, presumably, there will be a couple of years of bluster while he tries to wrest ‘concessions’ – probably in the area of employment ‘reform’ – from other European leaders supposedly cowed by the prospect of a UK exit. He would then have the job of passing off underwhelming clawbacks to an unimpressed electorate. As with the record of ‘convergence criteria’ for UK Euro entry under Tony Blair, the future is probably fudge.

Comments on “Cameron’s Euro Fudge”

  1. AllanLRB says:

    There’s a neat little set of hypocricies going on in relation to the EU and the Scottish independence question. Nationalists have often pointed out that the arguments for leaving the UK (broadly, unpopular policies imposed by a distant body with a questionable mandate) are pretty similar to those used by pro-union Europhobes about Europe. Now, the SNP are saying independence is the only way for Scots to remain in the EU, playing on the general sense that Scotland is more Europhile than the south of England. Leaving aside the obvious hypocrisies, Cameron’s stance does give the independence campaign a fillip, as it effectively neuters the pro-union camp’s complaints about uncertainty for business being created by having a referendum. And it takes a bit of the sting out of the guddle Alex Salmond got himself in about Scotland having to apply for EU membership.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement