« | Home | »

Five Ways of Looking at the Knesset

Tags: |

This is the way the results of the elections are being presented in the Israeli press:

Centre Left Bloc                                           Right Bloc

Other, perhaps more accurate ways to present the election results:

Left Bloc                                                         Right Bloc

Non-Jews                                                               Jews

Women                                                                     Men

Willing to take the necessary steps for a two-state solution?

Willing                                                            Unwilling

Comments on “Five Ways of Looking at the Knesset”

  1. klhoughton says:

    Sad most about that last. Jewish history (see the tale of living in Egypt that ends with Pesach, crossing a sea of reeds, and forty years of refusing to ask directions) tells us that having a majority population without representation is not sustainable.

    Given the choice between a Jewish state and a Democratic one, I personally would prefer the latter. But we didn’t start from there, and an independent Jewish state is hardly a valueless proposition.

    Given that, if the descendants of those who formed Israel and its post-1948 immigrants, wish to retain the former and not abjure the latter, the choices are spin-off (“two-state”) or treating non-Jews as equivalent to slaves. I’m not certain either of those is sustainable, but the choice is that of those who see the daily interactions.

    Whether they still believe a decision can be deferred or have made their choice is not clear from the vote, but let us be optimistic for the moment.

  2. Farbror 77 says:

    In the diagram Non-Jews/Jews, there seems to be 130 members of Knesset, while the others have 120, which is the correct total.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement