« | Home | »

Eggucate, Eggpower, Eggploy

Tags: |

On last Wednesday’s student demo, I and three other PhD students marched as the UCL Historians’ Bloc. Our placards summoned the spirits of E.P. Thompson and Eric Hobsbawm. It can seem as if raising a smile is the most to hope for from a protest when its manner, timing and location are subject to police permission (last year when the police threatened to use rubber bullets demonstrators responded with: ‘If I wanted to get shot I’d play Call of Duty’). Coming down the Embankment I bumped into an undergraduate from the course I teach on the revolutions of 1848. I’d been marking their essays the evening before for approximately £7 an hour. He told me he was one of UCL’s delegates to this year’s NUS conference. The slogan they chose for the demonstration was: ‘Tax the rich to fund education.’

The NUS president, Liam Burns, like all of his recent predecessors, is a member of the Labour Party, and the Union leadership preferred to rally around the Blairite bon mots ‘Educate, Empower, Employ’, which sounds like a slogan for one of the think tanks for which former NUS presidents seem to end up shilling. It is characteristic of an organisation that disowned student radicalisation in the winter of 2010 and which, like the Labour Party itself, isn’t opposed to charging students to go to university but disputes only how much to charge and how to collect the money. Michael Chessum, the president of the University of London Union and an organiser for the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts, described the NUS leadership as ‘demobilising and intellectually unserious’.

The demo was a wash-out in any case. The NUS had agreed a route with the police that took us along the Embankment towards Parliament, but then turned left across Waterloo Bridge to a rally at Kennington. No programme, no demands, and not even a political target for our anger. As the rain fell on a thinning crowd marching nowhere, the UCL Historians’ Bloc disbanded. Half of us went home to work, the other two to the pub, where we heard that Burns had been egged at the rally. This, it seems, was the work of the Imaginary Party, who had decided to eggucate Burns on the symbolic power of direct action.

Comments on “Eggucate, Eggpower, Eggploy”

  1. John Cowan says:

    Very like what Tristan Tzara (not the real one, but the one in Tom Stoppard’s Travesties) gives as an example of Dada, “The Eggboard, a sport or pastime for the top ten thousand, in which the players, covered from head to foot in egg-yolk, leave the field of play.”

  2. semitone says:

    Harry, I wish you well with your PhD. I guess even before you started it you’d already done, what is it, four years or more at uni. Can you remind me again why you don’t think you should have to pay for any of that?

    • Harry Stopes says:

      Thanks for your kind wishes semitone.
      Broadly speaking, for the same reasons that both you and I (assuming you’re in the UK) don’t have to pay at the point of use for healthcare or schooling up to 18. Clearly you have a different view, but this isn’t special pleading for university students on my part – HE and FE in general should be better provisioned, more widely available and free or at least cheap for everybody who would benefit from them.

  3. former_subscriber says:

    Why should a guy who fries chips for a living – for less than £7 an hour – pay for you to study?

    The economic reality is that subsidized state provision of higher education represents a net transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich.

    The idea of provisioning higher education for anybody who would benefit, includes, theoretically, everybody in the world.

    Furthermore, as you are surely aware, there is already a massive overproduction of graduates and post-graduates…

    For all of these reasons, in my opinion, the higher education system in the UK should be radically reformed, and the function of the university rethought.

    But what you have written here is indeed special pleading.

    • Harry Stopes says:

      It would be special pleading if I had said that I’d be happy to see the rest of public sector destroyed as long as the universities are saved.

    • robert higgo says:

      People who earn £7 an hour don’t pay UK income taxes. In case we really are concerned about their life chances, and fairness, we might want to consider how many years they would need to save to be able to afford £27k in tuition fees for a 3 year degree.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement