« | Home | »

Romney on Tour


Be glad Mitt Romney didn’t visit Auschwitz. That could have really been ugly. You know people like Mittens, as his former constituents in Massachusetts used to refer to him, without affection, also Mitt the Shit. You may even be related to someone like Mitt, perhaps by marriage: the sort of counter-intuitive person who, as if by some sinister gravitational pull, will inevitably step in it every time he opens his mouth. You may find something endearing about him, you may even love him in your own fashion, but you try, as best you can, not to go out in public with him if it’s at all possible. You certainly wouldn’t take him with you to Europe or the Middle East.

It’s almost possible to feel bad for Romney and his blundering. Many Americans found George W. Bush’s lurchings-about endearing. In fact, Bush’s handlers turned his capacity for saying stupid things in a stupid manner to his advantage. Hard to say who’s handling the Republican nominee these days, but there doesn’t seem to be any Romney to handle: he’s more like a projection on a wall or in the sky through some conjuring of shadow and light. Or a variation on Woody Allen’s Zelig: there he is with Lech Walesa; there with Cameron; there with Netanyahu. Oh, God, there he is frantically trying to figure out how to adjust his frozen smile at the Wailing Wall. Here comes Sheldon Adelson, Newt’s former benefactor, being trundled into an ‘intimate’ breakfast fundraiser with his henna’d combover, deranged smile and a pocketful of millions. ‘Shelly, shalom, shalom shalom, wonderful to see you looking so well.’ This does not sound convincing on the lips of a country club Republican. Now it’s fat old Lech they’re trundling on over there in Gdansk. ‘Fuck Obama,’ he growls into Mittens’s appreciative ear.

Sure, these are photo ops for all the old Jews in Florida, the American Poles in Chicago, Cleveland, Akron. Sure, Romney’s mouthing hateful, stupid notions about the Palestinians, Adelson clapping behind him like an overexcited old seal. Bad move telling the Brits that they blew security at the Olympics and that passport control at Heathrow’s not looking too good either, the cheeky boor. Dave, Boris and the tabloids teed that one up and sent it screaming 350 yards down the middle of the fairway. But then the Brits seem to live for catching Americans out saying stupid stuff. And we like nothing better than obliging you. But none of that really matters very much, just as Obama’s premature and obnoxious grandiosity in front of hundreds of thousands at the Brandenburg Gate before he was president didn’t really matter, at least to the American voting public. We don’t give a good goddamn what the hell you think.

What matters is that this is a presidential contest that a Republican ticket of Justin Bieber and Michelle Bachman could probably win, what with the economy tanking and little enthusiasm among Democrats for Obama. But what has the gruesome old Republican pooh-bahs tearing their hair out by the roots is that Mittens just might lose it.

Comments on “Romney on Tour”

  1. Rebentisch says:

    I see, you really don’t like the US Republican candidate. But why smear him in a that way? Why the hate talk? At least in Germany we are interested and open to get to know candidates from both sides, and there are many US citizens residing in Europe. Ah, I see, you “don’t give a good goddamn what the hell [we] think”. But let me tell you, you don’t have to express your political bias by affections, and US Presidential candidates probably should be more open-minded when the rest of the world is listening and disapprove swearing.

  2. Jason Farago says:

    While I agree with the sentiment of the last paragraph, I should point out that Justin Bieber is in fact Canadian, and therefore ineligible for the presidency (he’s also under 35). As this member of Congress points out, he is therefore a prime target for the Arizona immigration forces, under a law Mitt Romney called “a model for America”: http://goo.gl/XJryF

  3. break.itoff says:

    August Kleinzahler is from, I think, California, one of the places Romney has a shot at governing, and so can be excused for hating Romney no matter what he says. But when Romney says perfectly sensible things about the stupid way the Olympics have been managed by the Tories, shouldn’t the British left be on side? I haven’t seen that response anywhere.

    Does this mean that we simply care more about tittering at the Republicans than about what happens at home?

  4. Geoff Roberts says:

    I’ve heard it said that we survived Bush and that Romney couldn’t be any worse. I also heard the view that Europeans ‘respect’ Reagan, now that he has gone to meet his maker. Europeans tend to regard Republican candidates as cornbelt hicks who have no idea about what makes the world go round, well, this time I fear that we will find that Romney will be worse, far worse than Bush (II), Nixon and Reagan. I shudder at the thought that Romney will soon be telling us that he’s about to bomb Iran.

    • Bob Beck says:

      The only thing that worries me is voter-ID laws in various swing states, passed by Republicans, which tend to suppress the Democratic vote. Otherwise, despite the lousy economy, I think Obama can probably win. For a former governor, and also someone who ran for the nomination in 2008, Romney is an amazingly inept campaigner.

      Call it wishful thinking, but if stories about dissension among his top handlers start leaking out of Romney’s campaign team, we’ll know he’s really in trouble.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement